Biomimetic Dentistry: Less Drilling More Healing
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54361/ljmr.v14i2.02Keywords:
Biomimetic Dentistry, Dental Caries, Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART), Enamel, DentinAbstract
Biomimetic dentistry is an alternative approaching dentistry for dental caries management. It takes the potential advantageous features of maintaining, mimicking and replacing of natural dental tissues (enamel & dentin) in the mouth without using toxic restorative materials. Ultraconservative treatment is recommended for treating cavitated dentin lesions. Thus, Atraumatic Restorative Treatment is the most commonly used technique these days by dental clinicians worldwide. It is intended to both prevent dental caries and also to stop its further progression in the long-term. This short over view will attempt to provide a better understanding of biomimetic dentistry in terms of preventive/conservative approach for carious lesion removal and also to give a clinical perspective for Libyan dental clinicians.
References
Zafar M.S., Amin F., Fareed M.A., Ghabbani H., Riaz S., Khurshid Z.and Kumar N. (2020) Biomimetic aspects of restorative dentistry biomaterials. Biomimetics,5(3), 34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics5030034
Goswami S. (2018) Biomimetic dentistry .Journal of Oral Research and Review, 10(1), 28-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/jorr.jorr_3_17
Srinivasan K. and Chitra S. (2015) Emerging trends in oral health profession: the biomimetic-a review. Arch Dent Med Res., 1(3), 40-47.
McMahon S.M. and Evron E. (2011) Biomimetic principles applied to cosmetic dentistry. Cosmetic Tribune, 4(7).
Viswanath D. and Reddy A.V.K. (2014) Biomimetics in dentistry-a review. Indian Journal of Research in Pharmacy and Biotechnology, 2(5), 1384-1388.
Tinanoff N. (2019) Dental caries. In Pediatric Dentistry, pp. 169-179. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-60826-8.00012-2
Van Duinen R. (2007) The next step in restoratives. The Dentist, 25.
Nourmohammadi J., Sadrnezhaad S.K. and Ghader A.B. (2008) Bone-like apatite layer formation on the new resin-modified glass-ionomer cement .Journal of Materials Science: Materials inMedicine, 19(12), 3507-3514. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-008-3501-7
Yap A.U.J., Pek Y.S., Kumar R.A., Cheang P.and Khor K.A. (2002) Experimental studies on a new bioactive material: HAI onomer cements. Biomaterials, 23(3), 955-962. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(01)00208-3
Frencken J.E., Pilot T., Songpaisan Y. and Phantumvanit P. (1996) Atraumatic restorative treatment (ART): rationale, technique, and development. Journal of Public Health Dentistry, 56(3), 135-140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-7325.1996.tb02423.x
Nicholson J. (2010)Glass ionomer dental cements: update. Materials Technology: Advanced Performance Materials, 25(1), 8-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1179/175355509X12614966220506
Frencken J.E. (2009)Evolution of the the ART approach: highlights and achievements.Journal of Applied Oral Science, 17(SPE), 78-83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572009000700014
Frencken J.E., SongpaisanY., Phantumvanit P. and Pilot T. (1994) An atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) technique: evaluation after one year. International Dental Journal, 44, 460-464.
Mjör I. A. andGordan V. V. (1999) A review of atraumatic restorative treatment (ART). International Dental Journal, 49, 127-131. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1875-595X.1999.tb00896.x
Magne P. and Belser U. (2002) Bonded porcelain restorations in the anterior dentition: a biomimetic approach. Quintessence Publishing Company.
Schwendicke F., Paris S. and Tu Y.K. (2015) Effects of using different criteria for caries removal: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Journal of Dentistry, 43(1), 1-15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2014.10.004
Schwendicke F. and Göstemeyer G. (2016) Understanding dentists’ management of deep carious lesions in permanent teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Implementation Science, 11(1), 142. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-016-0505-4
Ten Cate J.M. and Van Duinen R.N.B. (1995) Hypermineralization of dentinal lesions adjacent to glass-ionomer cement restorations. Journal of Dental Research, 74(6), 1266-1271. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345950740060501
Hill R.G., Stamboulis A., Law R.V., Clifford A., Towler M.R, and Crowley C. (2004) The influence of strontium substitution in fluorapatite glasses and glass-ceramics. Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids, 336(3), 223-229. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2004.02.005
Mulligan S., Kakonyi G., Moharamzadeh K., Thornton S. F. and Martin N. (2018) The environmental impact of dental amalgam and resin-based composite materials. British Dental Journal, 224(7), 542-448. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2018.229
Hench L.L. (2006) The story of Bioglass®. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine, 17(11), 967-978. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-006-0432-z
Hench L.L. (2013) Chronology of bioactive glass development and clinical applications. New Journal of Glass and Ceramics, 3(2), 67-73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/njgc.2013.32011
Ngo H.C., Mount G., Mc Intyre J., Tuisuva J. and Von Doussa R.J. (2006) Chemical exchange between glass-ionomer restorations and residual carious dentine in permanent molars: an in vivo study. Journal of Dentistry, 34(8), 608-613. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2005.12.012
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Rawan M. Albeshti (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
