Cosmetic Management of Midline Diastema Using Direct Composite Resin: A Case Report
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54361/LJMR.19.1.25Keywords:
spacing between teeth, aesthetic, middle diastmaAbstract
A midline diastema, characterized by a space between the maxillary central incisors, is a common aesthetic concern with various potential causes. These causes include abnormal labial frenulum positioning, small or peg-shaped teeth, missing teeth, extra teeth such as mesiodens, cysts, harmful oral habits, dental anomalies, genetic factors, anterior tooth protrusion, skeletal discrepancies, and incomplete fusion of the interdental bone. Among the numerous treatment options, direct composite resin has emerged as a conservative, adaptable, and minimally invasive solution.
A visible midline gap is often perceived as a cosmetic issue, akin to malaligned or protruding teeth. Studies suggest that such diastemas may negatively affect social perceptions, leading to judgments regarding an individual's intelligence or social competence. Treatment strategies depend on the underlying cause and may include orthodontic therapy, restorative procedures, surgical correction, or a multidisciplinary approach. For cases involving a mismatch in tooth size, restorative treatments are particularly effective. Direct composite resin restorations offer numerous benefits over alternatives like ceramic veneers and orthodontics. These include time efficiency, as the procedure can typically be completed in a single visit without the need for preliminary models or wax-ups, as well as cost-effectiveness due to the absence of laboratory fees. Furthermore, composite restorations are less abrasive on opposing teeth than ceramic options.
This case report highlights the successful application of direct composite resin in closing a midline diastema, showcasing both the clinical approach and the practical advantages of this treatment method.
Downloads
References
1.Murchison DF, Roeters J, Vargas MA, Chan DCN. Direct Anterior Restorations. In: Summitt JB, Robbins JW, Hilton TJ, Schwartz RS, editors. Fundamentals of Operative Dentistry: A Contemporary Approach. 3rd ed. Chicago: Quintessence; 2006. pp. 274–279.
2.Kim YH, Cho YB. Diastema closure with direct composite: architectural gingival contouring. J Korean Acad Conserv Dent. 2011;36:515–520.
3.Lenhard M. Closing diastemas with resin composite restorations. Eur J Esthet Dent. 2008;3:258–268.
4.Azzaldeen A, Muhamad AH. Diastema Closure with Direct Composite: Architectural Gingival Contouring. J Adv Med Dent Scie Res 2014;3(1):1-6.
5. Abdulgani Azzaldeen1,Watted Nezar2,Abu-Hussein Muhamad3 DIRECT BONDING IN DIASTEMA CLOSURE HIGH DRAMA, IMMEDIATE RESOLUTION: A CASE REPORT.Ijdhs2014.1(4);430-435
6. Azzaldeen A, Nezar W, Muhamad AH. Direct bonding in diastema closure high drama, immediate resolution: a case report. Int J Dent Health Sci. 2014;1(4):430–5.
7. Korkut B, Yanikoglu F, Tagtekin D. Direct Midline Diastema Closure with Composite Layering Technique: A One-Year Follow-Up. Case Rep Dent. 2016;p. 6810984. doi:10.1155/2016/6810984.
8.Abdulgani M. Closing Diastemas With Resin Composite Restorations ; A Case Report. J Dent Med Sci. 2019;18(3):30–3
9. Hussein MA, Watted N. Azzaldeen Abdulgani; An Interdisciplinary Approach for Improved Esthetic Results in the Anterior Maxilla Diastema. J Dent Med Sci. 2003;14:96–101.
10. Magne P, Belser UC. Porcelain versus composite inlays/onlays: effects of mechanical loads on stress distribution, adhesion, and crown f lexure. Int J Period Restor Dent. 2003;23(6):543–55.
11. Korkut B, Yanıko˘ glu F, Günday M. Direct Composite Laminate Veneers: Three Case Reports. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2013;7(2):105–11.
12. Sabnis GK, Vasunni P, Mahale, Kamble GT. Esthetic Conservative Management of Interdental spaces using Direct Composite Resin
13.Jha S, Kapadia A, Karale R, Santhosh L. Novel Approach for the Closure of Multiple Diastema: A Clinical Technique. J Oper Dent Endod. 2017;2(2):84–91.
14. Jordan RE. Esthetic Composite Bonding Techniques and Materials, Mosby-Year Book. St. Louis, Mo, USA; 1993. p. 371.
15. Stappert CFJ, Ozden U, Gerds T, Strub JR. Longevity and failure load of ceramic veneers with different preparation designs after exposure to masticatory simulation. J Prosthetic Dent. 2005;94(2):132–9.
16. Garber DA, Goldstein RE, Feinman RA. Porcelain Laminate Veneers. vol. 3. Chicago, Ill, USA: Quintessence Publishing; 1988.
17. Prabhu R, Bhaskaran S, Prabhu KG, Eswaran M, Phanikrishna G, Deepthi B. Clinical evaluation of direct composite restoration done for midline diastema closure-long-term study. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2015;7(6):559–62.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Zohir Alaosta, Aihab Albaden, Ali Milad (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Open Access Policy
Libyan journal of medical Research (LJMR).is an open journal, therefore there are no fees required for downloading any publication from the journal website by authors, readers, and institution.
The journal applies the license of CC BY (a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license). This license allows authors to keep ownership f the copyright of their papers. But this license permits any user to download , print out, extract, reuse, archive, and distribute the article, so long as appropriate credit is given to the authors and the source of the work.
The license ensures that the article will be available as widely as possible and that the article can be included in any scientific archive.
Editorial Policy
The publication of an article in a peer reviewed journal is an essential model for Libyan journal of medical Research (LJMR). It is necessary to agree upon standards of expected ethical behavior for all parties involved in the act of publishing: the author, the journal editorial, the peer reviewer and the publisher.
Any manuscript or substantial parts of it, submitted to the journal must not be under consideration by any other journal. In general, the manuscript should not have already been published in any journal or other citable form, although it may have been deposited on a preprint server. Authors are required to ensure that no material submitted as part of a manuscript infringes existing copyrights, or the rights of a third party.
Authorship Policy
The manuscript authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution and intellectual input to the research submitted to the journal, including design, performance, interpretation of the reported study, and writing the manuscript. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors.
Others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the manuscript but without intellectual input should only be recognized in the acknowledgements section of the manuscript. Also, one of the authors should be selected as the corresponding author to communicate with the journal and approve the final version of the manuscript for publication in the LJMR.
Peer-review Policy
- All the manuscripts submitted to LJMR will be subjected to the double-blinded peer-review process;
- The manuscript will be reviewed by two suitable experts in the respective subject area.
- Reports of all the reviewers will be considered while deciding on acceptance/revision or rejection of a manuscript.
- Editor-In-Chief will make the final decision, based on the reviewer’s comments.
- Editor-In-Chief can ask one or more advisory board members for their suggestions upon a manuscript, before making the final decision.
- Associate editor and review editors provide administrative support to maintain the integrity of the peer-review process.
- In case, authors challenge the editor’s negative decision with suitable arguments, the manuscript can be sent to one more reviewer and the final decision will be made based upon his recommendations.
