Selection of Dental Cements in Prosthodontics: A Review Paper
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54361/ljmr15.1.11Keywords:
Dental Cements, Luting Agents, Zinc Phosphate Cement, Zinc Polycarboxylate Cement, Zinc Oxide Eugenol Cement, Glass Ionomer Cement, Resin Cement, Cast Restorations, SolubilityAbstract
The cementation procedures of crown and bridge is consider as an important stage, however, the selection of the proper cement is a significant, because the quality of the cement affects the durability of the restoration. In modern dentistry, many cementing and luting materials have been introduced. These materials differ in their properties and applications. This makes selection of suitable cement for specific clinical situation often difficult. The aim of this paper is to review and analyze dental cements used in dentistry, mainly in fixed prosthodontics in order to help practitioners select the most convenient cement material in dental practice. Moreover, this review paper will consider the structures, properties and the application of dental cements in specific clinical situations.
Downloads
References
Rosenstiel S.F., Land M.F., and Crispin B.J. (1998) Dental luting agents: A review of the current literature. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 80(3):280-301.
Black S.M. and Charlton G. (1990) Survival of crowns and bridges related to luting cements. Restorative Dent, 6(3):26-30.
Jacobs M.S. and Wendler A.S. (1991) An investigation of dental luting cement solubility as a function of the marginal gap. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 65(3):436-42.
Hill E.E. (2007) Dental cements for definitive luting: a review and practical clinical considerations. Dental Clinics of North America, 51(3):643-658.
Hill E.E. and Lott J. (2011) A clinically focused discussion of luting materials. Australian Dental Journal, 56(1):67-76.
Walton J.N., Gardner F.M., and Agar J.R. (1986) A survey of crown and fixed partial denture failures: length of service and reasons for replacement. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 56(4):416-21.
Dupuis V., Laviole O., Potin-Gautier M., Castetbon A., and Moya F. (1992) Solubility and disintegration of zinc phosphate cement. Biomaterials, 13(7):467-70.
Swartz M.L., Phillips R.W., Pareja C., and Moore B.K. (1989) In vitro degradation of cements: a comparison of three test methods. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 62(1):17-23.
Knibbs P.J., and Walls A.W. (1989) A laboratory and clinical evaluation of three dental luting cements. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, 16(5):467-73.
Attar N., Tam L.E., and McComb D. (2003) Mechanical and physical properties of contemporary dental luting agents. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 89(2):127-34.
De la Macorra J.C., and Pradíes G. (2002) Conventional and adhesive luting cements. Clinical Oral Investigations, 6(4):198-204.
Pegoraro T.A., Da Silva N.R., and Carvalho R.M. (2007) Cements for use in esthetic dentistry. Dental Clinic of North America, 51(2):453-71.
Ladha K. and Verma M. (2010). Conventional and contemporary luting cements: an overview. Journal of Indian Prosthodontics Society, 10(2), 79–88.
Brannstrom M. and Nyborg H. (1977) Pulpal reaction to polycarboxylate and zinc phosphate cements used with inlays in deep cavity preparations. Journal of American Dental Association, 94(2):308-10.
Kern M., Kleimeier B., Schaller H.G., and Strub J.R. (1996) Clinical comparison of postoperative sensitivity for a glass ionomer and a zinc phosphate luting cement. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 75(2):159-62.
Donovan T.E. and Cho G.C. (1999) Contemporary evaluation of dental cements. Compendium of Continuing Education in Dentistry, 20(3): 197-9, 202-8, 210 passim; quiz 220.
Langeland K. and Langeland L.K. (1965) Pulp Reactions To Crown Preparation, Impression, Temporary Crown Fixation, And Permanent Cementation. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 15:129-43.
Lam C.W. and Wilson P.R. (1999) Crown cementation and pulpal health. International Endodontic Journal, 32: 249-256.
Charlton D.G., Moore B.K., and Swartz M.L. (1991) Direct surface pH determinations of setting cements. Operative Dentistry, 16(6):231-238.
Mausner I.K., Goldstein G.R., and Georgescu M. (1996) Effect of two dentinal desensitizing agents on retention of complete cast coping using four cements. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry,75(2):129-34.
Silvey R.G., and Myers G.E. (1977) Clinical study of dental cements. VI. A study of zinc phosphate, EBA-reinforced zinc oxide eugenol and polyacrylic acid cements as luting agents in fixed prostheses. Journal of Dental Research, 56(10):1215-8.
Swartz M.L., Phillips R.W., Pareja C., and Moore B.K. (1989) In vitro degradation of cements: a comparison of three test methods. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 62(1):17-23.
Christensen G.J. (1994) Why is glass ionomer cement so popular? The Journal of the American Dental Association, 125(9):1257-8.
Muzynski B.L., Greener E., Jameson L., and Malone W.F. (1988) Fluoride release from glass ionomers used as luting agents. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 60(1):41- 4.
Rosenstiel S.F. and Rashid R.G. (2003) Post-cementation hypersensitivity: scientific data versus dentists' perceptions. Journal of Prosthodontics, 12(2):73-81.
Heys R.J., Fitzgerald M., Heys D.R., and Charbeneau G.T. (1987) An evaluation of a glass ionomer luting agent: pulpal histological response. The Journal of the American Dental Association, 114(5):607-11.
Torstenson B. (1995) Pulpal reaction to a dental adhesive in deep human cavities. Endodontics & Dental Traumatology, 11(4):172-6.
McLean J.W. (1988) Glass-ionomer cements. British Dental Journal,164(9):293-300.
Peutzfeldt A. (1996) Compomers and glass ionomers: bond strength to dentin and mechanical properties. American Journal of Dentistry, 9(6):259-63.
Pameijer C.H. (2012) A review of luting agents. International Journal of Dentistry, 2012:752861.
Yu H., Zheng M., Chen R., and Cheng H. (2014) Proper selection of contemporary dental cements. Oral Health and Dental Management, 13(1):54-9.
Leevailoj C., Platt J.A., Cochran M.A., and Moore B.K. (1998) In vitro study of fracture incidence and compressive fracture load of all-ceramic crowns cemented with resin-modified glass ionomer and other luting agents. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 80(6):699-707.
Wu J.C. and Wilson P.R. (1994) Optimal cement space for resin luting cements. International Journal of Prosthodontics, 7(3):209-15.
Wu J.C. and Wilson P.R. (1994) Resin luting cements for full coverage restorations. Journal of Australian Prosthodontics Society, 8:55-63.
Tsujimoto A., Barkmeier W.W., Takamizawa T., Latta M.A., and Miayazaki M. (2017) Relationship Between Simulated Gap Wear and Generalized Wear of Resin Luting Cements. Operative Dentistry, 42(5):E148-E158.
Pereira S.G., Fulgêncio R., Nunes T.G., Toledano M., Osorio R., and Carvalho R.M. (2010) Effect of curing protocol on the polymerization of dual-cured resin cements. Dental Materials, 26(7):710-8.
Radovic I., Monticelli F., Goracci C., Vulicevic Z.R., and Ferrari M. (2008) Self- adhesive resin cements: a literature review. Journal of Adhesive Dentistry, 10(4):251- 8.
Behr M., Rosentritt M., Wimmer J., Lang R., Kolbeck C., Bürgers R., and Handel G. (2009) Self-adhesive resin cement versus zinc phosphate luting material: a prospective clinical trial begun 2003. Dental Materials, 25(5):601-4.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Mofida R. Khmaj, Abdulfatah B. Khmaj, Zakaria A. Khmaj (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Open Access Policy
Libyan journal of medical Research (LJMR).is an open journal, therefore there are no fees required for downloading any publication from the journal website by authors, readers, and institution.
The journal applies the license of CC BY (a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license). This license allows authors to keep ownership f the copyright of their papers. But this license permits any user to download , print out, extract, reuse, archive, and distribute the article, so long as appropriate credit is given to the authors and the source of the work.
The license ensures that the article will be available as widely as possible and that the article can be included in any scientific archive.
Editorial Policy
The publication of an article in a peer reviewed journal is an essential model for Libyan journal of medical Research (LJMR). It is necessary to agree upon standards of expected ethical behavior for all parties involved in the act of publishing: the author, the journal editorial, the peer reviewer and the publisher.
Any manuscript or substantial parts of it, submitted to the journal must not be under consideration by any other journal. In general, the manuscript should not have already been published in any journal or other citable form, although it may have been deposited on a preprint server. Authors are required to ensure that no material submitted as part of a manuscript infringes existing copyrights, or the rights of a third party.
Authorship Policy
The manuscript authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution and intellectual input to the research submitted to the journal, including design, performance, interpretation of the reported study, and writing the manuscript. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors.
Others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the manuscript but without intellectual input should only be recognized in the acknowledgements section of the manuscript. Also, one of the authors should be selected as the corresponding author to communicate with the journal and approve the final version of the manuscript for publication in the LJMR.
Peer-review Policy
- All the manuscripts submitted to LJMR will be subjected to the double-blinded peer-review process;
- The manuscript will be reviewed by two suitable experts in the respective subject area.
- Reports of all the reviewers will be considered while deciding on acceptance/revision or rejection of a manuscript.
- Editor-In-Chief will make the final decision, based on the reviewer’s comments.
- Editor-In-Chief can ask one or more advisory board members for their suggestions upon a manuscript, before making the final decision.
- Associate editor and review editors provide administrative support to maintain the integrity of the peer-review process.
- In case, authors challenge the editor’s negative decision with suitable arguments, the manuscript can be sent to one more reviewer and the final decision will be made based upon his recommendations.
