Reviewer Guidelines

Reviewer Guidelines
Reviewer Guidelines
To provide readers with free access to valuable scholarly research, LJMR has established its open access journal. All of our published content in LJMR is subject to the highest academic standards. Before any manuscript is finally accepted for publication, a peer review process aims to assess its originality, validity, and overall quality.
Reviewers contribute to the integrity of the publishing process by preventing the publication of plagiarized, low-quality, or inappropriate work.

Reviewer
Peer review is essential to maintaining the quality and credibility of academic and scientific research. LJMR strongly supports peer review procedures and values ​​the contributions of reviewers to the journal's achievements. Reviewers are selected based on their expertise in their respective fields, and based on their contribution to their journal, they may be offered a more prestigious position. Before any manuscript is finally accepted for publication, reviewers are required to provide honest feedback and critiques.

Peer Review Process
Peer review in LJMR is based on the double-blind principle. Upon acceptance of a manuscript for review, neither the reviewers nor the authors are informed of the author's name, contact information, or any of their affiliates. Reviewers evaluate each manuscript for accuracy, originality, and completeness.

Important Notes
• Reviewers should be able to assess the overall quality of the manuscript.
• Reviewers provide comments and ideas for improvement rather than editing the content of the manuscript.
• During the peer review process, reviewers must maintain their anonymity and confidentiality; they are not permitted to contact the author without the approval of the journal's editor-in-chief.
• If you have any questions regarding the ethics or conduct of an author or reviewer, please contact the journal's editor-in-chief.
• Any questions regarding the ethical conduct of authors or reviewers should be directed to the journal's editor-in-chief. • An author's nationality, race, gender, ethnicity, religion, or political views should not influence the reviewer's decisions. • The sole criterion for evaluation is the truthfulness and quality of the information provided.