Biomimetic Dentistry: Less Drilling More Healing
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54361/ljmr.v14i2.02Keywords:
Biomimetic Dentistry, Dental Caries, Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART), Enamel, DentinAbstract
Biomimetic dentistry is an alternative approaching dentistry for dental caries management. It takes the potential advantageous features of maintaining, mimicking and replacing of natural dental tissues (enamel & dentin) in the mouth without using toxic restorative materials. Ultraconservative treatment is recommended for treating cavitated dentin lesions. Thus, Atraumatic Restorative Treatment is the most commonly used technique these days by dental clinicians worldwide. It is intended to both prevent dental caries and also to stop its further progression in the long-term. This short over view will attempt to provide a better understanding of biomimetic dentistry in terms of preventive/conservative approach for carious lesion removal and also to give a clinical perspective for Libyan dental clinicians.
Downloads
References
Zafar M.S., Amin F., Fareed M.A., Ghabbani H., Riaz S., Khurshid Z.and Kumar N. (2020) Biomimetic aspects of restorative dentistry biomaterials. Biomimetics,5(3), 34.
Goswami S. (2018) Biomimetic dentistry .Journal of Oral Research and Review, 10(1), 28-32.
Srinivasan K. and Chitra S. (2015) Emerging trends in oral health profession: the biomimetic-a review. Arch Dent Med Res., 1(3), 40-47.
McMahon S.M. and Evron E. (2011) Biomimetic principles applied to cosmetic dentistry. Cosmetic Tribune, 4(7).
Viswanath D. and Reddy A.V.K. (2014) Biomimetics in dentistry-a review. Indian Journal of Research in Pharmacy and Biotechnology, 2(5), 1384-1388.
Tinanoff N. (2019) Dental caries. In Pediatric Dentistry, pp. 169-179.
Van Duinen R. (2007) The next step in restoratives. The Dentist, 25.
Nourmohammadi J., Sadrnezhaad S.K. and Ghader A.B. (2008) Bone-like apatite layer formation on the new resin-modified glass-ionomer cement .Journal of Materials Science: Materials inMedicine, 19(12), 3507-3514.
Yap A.U.J., Pek Y.S., Kumar R.A., Cheang P.and Khor K.A. (2002) Experimental studies on a new bioactive material: HAI onomer cements. Biomaterials, 23(3), 955-962.
Frencken J.E., Pilot T., Songpaisan Y. and Phantumvanit P. (1996) Atraumatic restorative treatment (ART): rationale, technique, and development. Journal of Public Health Dentistry, 56(3), 135-140.
Nicholson J. (2010)Glass ionomer dental cements: update. Materials Technology: Advanced Performance Materials, 25(1), 8-13.
Frencken J.E. (2009)Evolution of the the ART approach: highlights and achievements.Journal of Applied Oral Science, 17(SPE), 78-83.
Frencken J.E., SongpaisanY., Phantumvanit P. and Pilot T. (1994) An atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) technique: evaluation after one year. International Dental Journal, 44, 460-464.
Mjör I. A. andGordan V. V. (1999) A review of atraumatic restorative treatment (ART). International Dental Journal, 49, 127-131.
Magne P. and Belser U. (2002) Bonded porcelain restorations in the anterior dentition: a biomimetic approach. Quintessence Publishing Company.
Schwendicke F., Paris S. and Tu Y.K. (2015) Effects of using different criteria for caries removal: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Journal of Dentistry, 43(1), 1-15.
Schwendicke F. and Göstemeyer G. (2016) Understanding dentists’ management of deep carious lesions in permanent teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Implementation Science, 11(1), 142.
Ten Cate J.M. and Van Duinen R.N.B. (1995) Hypermineralization of dentinal lesions adjacent to glass-ionomer cement restorations. Journal of Dental Research, 74(6), 1266-1271.
Hill R.G., Stamboulis A., Law R.V., Clifford A., Towler M.R, and Crowley C. (2004) The influence of strontium substitution in fluorapatite glasses and glass-ceramics. Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids, 336(3), 223-229.
Mulligan S., Kakonyi G., Moharamzadeh K., Thornton S. F. and Martin N. (2018) The environmental impact of dental amalgam and resin-based composite materials. British Dental Journal, 224(7), 542-448.
Hench L.L. (2006) The story of Bioglass®. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine, 17(11), 967-978.
Hench L.L. (2013) Chronology of bioactive glass development and clinical applications. New Journal of Glass and Ceramics, 3(2), 67-73.
Ngo H.C., Mount G., Mc Intyre J., Tuisuva J. and Von Doussa R.J. (2006) Chemical exchange between glass-ionomer restorations and residual carious dentine in permanent molars: an in vivo study. Journal of Dentistry, 34(8), 608-613.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Rawan M. Albeshti (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Open Access Policy
Libyan journal of medical Research (LJMR).is an open journal, therefore there are no fees required for downloading any publication from the journal website by authors, readers, and institution.
The journal applies the license of CC BY (a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license). This license allows authors to keep ownership f the copyright of their papers. But this license permits any user to download , print out, extract, reuse, archive, and distribute the article, so long as appropriate credit is given to the authors and the source of the work.
The license ensures that the article will be available as widely as possible and that the article can be included in any scientific archive.
Editorial Policy
The publication of an article in a peer reviewed journal is an essential model for Libyan journal of medical Research (LJMR). It is necessary to agree upon standards of expected ethical behavior for all parties involved in the act of publishing: the author, the journal editorial, the peer reviewer and the publisher.
Any manuscript or substantial parts of it, submitted to the journal must not be under consideration by any other journal. In general, the manuscript should not have already been published in any journal or other citable form, although it may have been deposited on a preprint server. Authors are required to ensure that no material submitted as part of a manuscript infringes existing copyrights, or the rights of a third party.
Authorship Policy
The manuscript authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution and intellectual input to the research submitted to the journal, including design, performance, interpretation of the reported study, and writing the manuscript. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors.
Others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the manuscript but without intellectual input should only be recognized in the acknowledgements section of the manuscript. Also, one of the authors should be selected as the corresponding author to communicate with the journal and approve the final version of the manuscript for publication in the LJMR.
Peer-review Policy
- All the manuscripts submitted to LJMR will be subjected to the double-blinded peer-review process;
- The manuscript will be reviewed by two suitable experts in the respective subject area.
- Reports of all the reviewers will be considered while deciding on acceptance/revision or rejection of a manuscript.
- Editor-In-Chief will make the final decision, based on the reviewer’s comments.
- Editor-In-Chief can ask one or more advisory board members for their suggestions upon a manuscript, before making the final decision.
- Associate editor and review editors provide administrative support to maintain the integrity of the peer-review process.
- In case, authors challenge the editor’s negative decision with suitable arguments, the manuscript can be sent to one more reviewer and the final decision will be made based upon his recommendations.
