Attachment Systems Retained Implant Overdentures: an Overview

Amged A, Al faleeth; Saied H.  Mohamed; Fatima I,  Abusua

doi:10.54361/

Authors

Amged A, Alfaleeth AssistantLecturer at Removable of Prosthodontics Department, Higher Institute of Medical Professions, Libya Author
Saied H. Mohamed Professor at Removable Prosthodontics Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Benghazi University, Libya Author
Fatima I, Abusua Lecturer at Removable of Prosthodontics Science of Dental Material Department of Dental Material, Faculty of Dentistry, Tripoli University, Libya Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54361/

Keywords:

Types, and Systems of Attachment, Literatures Review

Abstract

The most common prosthetic problems in mandibular and maxillary dentures are lack of retention, stability and continue residual ridge resorbtion. So the patient needs greater retention to use their dentures. Attachment systems have been used for improving the retention and stability of implant supported overdentures in edentulous arches. Variety of commercially available attachment systems are used to retain implants overdentures. The attachments include stud, magmatic, telescopic and bar attachments. In the present article, were reviewed the literature concerning the types and design of attachments systems currently available.

References

Kapur K, Garrett N, Hamada M, Roumanas E, Freymiller E, Han T, et,al. Randomized clinical trial comparing the efficacy of mandibular implant supported overdentures and conventional dentures in diabetic patients. Part III: comparisons of patient satisfaction. J Prosthet Dent. 1999; 82: 416–427.

Cune M, van Kampen F, van der Bilt A, Bosman F. Patient satisfaction and preference with magnet, bar-clip, and ball-socket retained mandibular implant overdentures: a cross-over clinical trial. Int J Prosthet Dent. 2005; 18:99–105.

Savabi O, Nejatidanesh F, Yordshahian F. Retention of implant-supported overdenture with bar/clip and stud attachment designs. J Oral Implantology. 2013; XXXIX: 140-147

Williams B, Ochiai K, Hojo S, Nishimura R, Caputo A. Retention of maxillary implant overdenture bars of different designs. J Prosthet Dent. 2001; 86: 603–607.

Hjørting-Hansen E, Laney W, Broggini N, Buser D, Cochran D, Garcia L, et al. Glossary of oral and maxillofacial implants: Quint Pub Ltd. Chicago, 2007, 224 .

swain MV. Attachment systems for mandibular two-implant overdentures: a review of in vitro investigations on retention and wear features. Int J Prosthet Dent. 2009; 5:429-440.

Visser A, Raghoebar G, Meijer H, Vissink A. Implant-retained maxillary overdentures on milled bar supra structures: a year follow-up of surgical and prosthetic care and aftercare. Int J Prosthet Dent. 2009;22: 181-92.

Slot W, Raghoebar G, Dijk G, Meijer H. Attachment of clips in a bar-retained maxillary implant overdenture: A clinical report. J Prosthet Dent. 2012;107: 353357

Shafie H. Principles of attachment selection. Clinical and Laboratory Manual of Implant Overdentures Ames, Iowa: Blackwell. 2007.

Trakas T, Michalakis K, Kang K, Hirayama H Attachment systems for implant retained overdentures: a literature review. Implant Dent. 2006; 15: 24-34.

Osman RBM. Prosthodontic Outcomes of Zirconia Implants Supporting Overdentures: University of Otago; 2013; 6:277-8.

Kakar. Oral implantology 1st Ed. New delhi. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers Pvt Ltd, 2001.

Walton J, MacEntee M, Glick N. One-year prosthetic outcomes with implant overdentures: a randomized clinical trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2002;17:391-398.

Brewer AA, Fenton AH. The overdenture. Dent Clin North Am. 1973; 17: 723746.

Winkler S, Piermatti J, Rothman A, Siamos G. An overview of the O-ring implantoverdenture attachment: clinical reports. J Oral Implants. 2002; 28: 8286.

Rodrigues R, Faria A, Macedo A, Sartori I, de MattosMda G. An in vitro study of non-axial forces upon the retention of an O-ring attachment. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009; 20:1314-1319.

Slot W, Raghoebar G, Vissink A, Meijer H. Maxillary overdentures supported by anteriorly or posteriorly placed implants opposed by a natural dentition in the mandible: a 1‐year prospective case series study. Clin Implant Dent and Related Res. 2014;16:51-61.

Tabata LF, Assunção WG, Barão VA, Gomes EA, Delben JA, de Sousa EA, et al. Comparison of single-standing or connected implants on stress distribution in bone of mandibular overdentures: a two-dimensional finite element analysis. J Craniofac Surgery. 2010;21:696-702

Sadowsky SJ. Mandibular implant-retained overdentures: a literature review J Prosthet Dent. 2001; 86 : 468–473.

Jiménez-Lopez V. Oral rehabilitation with implant-supported prostheses. In Implant supported mandibular overdenture Chicago, Berlin, London, Paris: Quint pub Co, USA. 1999.

Krennmair G, Weinlander M, Krainhofner M, Piehslinger E Implant-supported mandibular overdentures retained with ball or telescopic crown attachments: a 3year prospective study. Int J Prosthet Dent. 2006; 19: 164-170.

Krennmair G, Ulm C The symphyseal single-tooth implant for anchorage of a mandibular complete denture in geriatric patients: a clinical report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2001; 16: 9

Naert I, Alsaadi G, Quirynen M. Prosthetic aspects and patient satisfaction with two-implant-retained mandibular overdentures: a 10-year randomized clinical study. Int J Prosthodont.2004; 17: 401-410.

Van Kampen F, Cune M, van der Bilt A, Bosman F. Retention and postinsertion maintenance of bar-clip, ball and magnet attachments in mandibular implant overdenture treatment: an in vivo comparison after 3 months of function. Clin Oral Implants Res.2003; 14: 720-726.

Swain MV. Attachment systems for mandibular two-implant overdentures: a review of in vitro investigations on retention and wear features. IntJ prosthodont . 2009;22:429-440.

Mangano F, Mangano C, Ricci M, Sammons R, Shibli J, Piattelli A. Single‐tooth Morse taper connection implants placed in fresh extraction sockets of the anterior maxilla: an aesthetic evaluation. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012;23:1302-1307.

Assunçāo WG, Barāo VA, Tabata LF, De Sousa EA, Gomes EA, Delben JA. Comparison between complete denture and implant‐retained overdenture: effect of different mucosa thickness and resiliency on stress distribution. Gerodontology. 2009;26:273

Bornstein M, Cionca N, Mombelli A. Systemic conditions and treatments as risks for implant therapy. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009; 24: 12-27

Sugerman PB, Barber MT. Patient selection for endosseous dental implants: oral and systemic considerations. IntJ OralMaxillofaci Implants 2002; 17: 191-201.

Gotfredsen K, Holm B. Implant-supported mandibular overdentures retained with ball or bar attachments: a randomized prospective 5-year study. Int J Int J Prosthet Dent, 2000;13:125-130.

Batenburg R, Raghoebar G, Van Oort R, Heijdenrijk K, BoeringMandibular overdentures supported by two or four endosteal implants: a prospective, comparative study. Int J Oral Maxillofacsurgical 1998; 27: 435-439.

Visser A, Raghoebar GM, Meijer HJ, Batenburg RH, Vissink A. Mandibular overdentures supported by two or four endosseous implants. Clinical oral implants research 2005; 16: 19-25.

Heckmann S, Schrott A, Graef F, Wichmann M, Weber H. Mandibular twoimplant telescopic overdentures. Clin Oral implants Res. 2004; 15: 560-569.

El-Dayem MA, Assad AS, Sanad ME, Mogahed SA. Comparison of prefabricated and custom-made bars used for implant-retained mandibular complete overdentures. Implant dentistry. 2009;18:501-511.

Mericske‐Stern R, Taylor T, Belser U. Management of the edentulous patient. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2000;11:108-125.

Guttal SS, Tavargeri AK, Nadiger RK, Thakur SL. Use of an implant o-ring attachment for the tooth supported mandibular overdenture: A clinical report. J Euro Dent . 2011; 5: 331.

overdentures: experimental analysis with photoelasticity. Quint Int . 1997;28:50-54.

Boeckler A, Ehring C, Morton D, Geis‐Gerstorfer J, Setz J. Corrosion of dental magnet attachments for removable prostheses on teeth and implants. J Int J Prosthet Dent. 2009;18:308.

Ceruti P, Bryant S, Lee J ,MacEntee M. Magnet-retained implant-supported overdentures: review and 1-year clinical report. J Can Dent Assoc. 2010;76 :1-6.

Krennmair, G, Suto D, Seemann R. Patient preference and satisfaction with implant-supported mandibular overdentures retained with ball or locator attachments: a crossover clinical trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2012. 27: 1560-1568.

El-Taftazani I, Moubarak A, El-Anwar M. Locator attachment versus ball attachment: 3-Dimensional finite element study.J Egypt Dent. 2011; 57: 73-85.

-Budtz-Jørgensen E. Restoration of the partially edentulous mouth-a comparison of overdentures, removable partial dentures, fixed partial dentures and implant treatment. J Dent. 1996; 24: 237-244.

Preiskel HW. Precision attachments in prosthodontics: overdentures and telescopic prostheses: Quint Pub Company; 1985; 2.: 125-137.

Walton JN, Huizinga SC, Peck CC. Implant angulation: a measurement technique, implant overdenture maintenance, and the influence of surgical experience. IntJ Int J Prosthet Dent. 2001;14: 523–530.

Wolfe R. Symposium on semiprecision attachments in removable partial dentures. Extracoronal attachments. Dental clinics of North America. 1985;29:185198.

Chen I , Brudvik J, Mancl L, Rubenstein J, Chitswe K, Raigrodski AJ. Freedom of rotation of selected overdenture attachments: an in vitro study. J Int J Prosthet Dent. 2011;106:78-86.

Al qutaibi AY. Attachments used with implant supported overdenture. J Adv Dent Oral Health. 2016 ; 1: 001-005.

Sadowsky SJ. Treatment considerations for maxillary implant overdentures: a systematic review. J Int J Prosthet Dent. 2007; 97: 340-348.

Misch CE. Contemporary implant dentistry. Elsevier Health Sciences.2007.