Antimicrobial Sensitivity Patterns of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Isolates Obtained From Foot Ulcer Diabetes Patients in Tripoli, Libya.

Authors

  • Abdulkareem Elbaz Department of Microbiology and Parasitology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Tripoli University Author
  • A. Dhawi Department of Microbiology and Parasitology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Tripoli University Author
  • Asma K. Elramalli Department of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Tripoli University . Author
  • Ibrahim A. Algondi Tripoli Medical Centre, Tripoli, Libya Author
  • Asadik Anan Department of Zoology, Faculty of Sciences-Alassaba, Gharyan University Author
  • Altayeb Elazomi Department of Medical Laboratories, Faculty of Medical Technology, University of Zawia Author
  • Mustafa Saieh Department of Zoology, Faculty of Sciences-Alassaba, Gharyan University Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54361/

Keywords:

Pseudomonas aeruginosa, diabetic foot ulcer, antibiotics resistance.

Abstract

Background: Pseudomonas aeruginosa is one of the most invasive organism that  causes severe tissue damage in diabetic foot ulcers. A major problem in P. aeruginosa infection because of that it is commonly exhibits a high degree of resistance to antimicrobial agents. To improve appropriate antimicrobial therapy and reduce the incidence of antibiotics resistant bacteria, information on the antibiotic susceptibility to this bacterium is urgently needed. Therefore, the aim of this study was to isolate and  determinate the antimicrobial susceptibility of the P. aeruginosa in diabetic foot ulcers patients. Methods: This study was carried out over the period between June 2014 to April 2015 at Tripoli Medical Center. A total of 120 bacterial isolates were cultured onto bacteriological media such as nutrient agar, MacConkey agar and blood agar. Identification of retrieved bacterial isolates was done using standard diagnostic microbiological laboratory methods and antibiogram was determined by VITEK ® 2 compact automated system. Results: Twenty one strains of P. aeruginosa from 120 diabetic foot ulcers were detected. P. aeruginosa  isolates exhibited multidrug resistance to Ampicillin, Augmenting, Cefuroxime,  Cefoxitin, Cefazolin, Ceftriaxone, Trimethoprim/sulfamethzole, Piperacillin. However, all isolates of P. aeruginosa were 100 % sensitive to Imipenem. Conclusion: P. aeruginosa infections of diabetic foot ulcers patients have multi-drug resistant. Imipenem is the empirical antibiotic of the choice.

References

Dhanasekaran G, Sastry N. G, and Mohan V, “Microbial pattern of soft-tissue infections in diabetic patients in South India,” Asian Journal of Diabetology, vol. 5, no. 5-6, pp. 8–10, 2003.

Baltimore R. S, “Pseudomonas,” inNelson Textbook of Pediatrics, pp. 862–864, 2000.

Sivanmaliappan TS, Sevanan, Antimicrobial Susceptibility Patterns of Pseudomonas aeruginosa from Diabetes Patients with Foot Ulcers. Int J Microbiol 2011: 605195.

Iglewski BH (1996) Pseudomonas. In: Baron's Medical Microbiology. (4th ed), Univ of Texas Medical Branch.

Sadikot RT, Blackwell TS, Christman JW et al. Pathogen–host interactions in Pseudomonas aeruginosa pneumonia. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2005; 171: 1209–23.

Cheesbrough M (2001) District laboratory practice in tropical countries. University Press, Cambridge, UK

Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing; Twenty Third Informational Supplement. CLSI document M100-S23; 2013;33:1.

El-Tahawy AT. Bacteriology of diabetic foot. Saudi Med J. 2000;21;344-7.

Sadikot RT, Blackwell TS, Christman JW et al. Pathogen–host interactions in Pseudomonas aeruginosa pneumonia. Am J RespirCritCare Med 2005; 171: 1209–23.

Mitsuhashi, S. 1983. In-vitro and in-vivo antibacterial activity of imipenem against clinical isolates of bacteria. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 12(Suppl. D):53-64.

Petrosillo N, Ioannidou E, Falagas ME. Colistin monotherapy vs. combination therapy: evidence from microbiological, animal and clinical studies. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2008; 14: 816–827. pmid:18844682

Noreddin AM, Elkhatib WF. Levofloxacin in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2010;8:505–514. pmid:20455679

Castanheira M, Mills JC, Farrell DJ, Jones RN. Mutation-driven β-lactam resistance mechanisms among contemporary ceftazidime-nonsusceptible Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from U.S. hospitals. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014; 58: 6844–6850. pmid:25182652

Chaudhary M, Shrivastava SM, Varughese L, Sehgal R. Efficacy and safety evaluation of fixed dose combination of cefepime and amikacin in comparison with cefepime alone in treatment of nosocomial pneumonia patients. Curr Clin Pharmacol. 2008; 3:118–122. pmid:18700304

Al Benwan KAl Mulla A, Rotimi VO A study of the microbiology of diabetic foot infections in a teaching hospital in Kuwait.J Infect Public Health .2012; 5 (1): 1-8

Shen Q, Lin D, Zhu H, Ge S, Wu W, Pan X, Gu X, Shen F. Clinical distribution and antimicrobial resistance analysis of 754 pathogenic bacteria in diabetic foot infection. Zhonghua Yi XueZaZhi1. 2014; 94(12):889-94

Rastogi A, Sukumar S, Hajela A, Mukherjee S, Dutta P, Bhadada SK, Bhansali A. J Diabetes Complications. 2017; 31(2):407-412

Downloads

Published

31-12-2018

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

1.
Elbaz A, Dhawi A, Elramalli AK, Algondi IA, Anan A, Elazomi A, et al. Antimicrobial Sensitivity Patterns of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Isolates Obtained From Foot Ulcer Diabetes Patients in Tripoli, Libya. LJMR [Internet]. 2018 Dec. 31 [cited 2024 Nov. 24];12(2):182-6. Available from: https://ljmr.ly/index.php/ljmr/article/view/260