PREVELANCE OF CESAREAN SECTION AND IT’S RELATED FACTORS IN SUBRATA HOSPITA, LIBYA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26719/LJM19.1.14Keywords:
cesarean sections, age, height,, breech presentation, fetal distress, deliveryAbstract
This study aims to identify the prevalence of cesarean sections at Subrata Hospital and assess the relationship between cesarean deliveries and factors such as maternal age, maternal height, breech presentation, and fetal distress. A cross-sectional study was conducted involving 118 mothers who delivered either via cesarean section or normal delivery in Subrata Hospital from June 1, 2024, to July 31, 2024. The study utilized universal sampling and analyzed data from medical records using descriptive statistics and the T- test for association through SPSS software. The study found that 50% of deliveries were cesarean sections. Age analysis showed that 46% of participants were older than 35, and this group had a statistically significant association with increased cesarean rates (p = 0.030). Additionally, 64% of mothers were under 150 cm in height, which was associated with a higher likelihood of cesarean delivery (p = 0.034). Fetal distress was present in 38% of cases, showing a significant link to cesarean delivery (p = 0.032). Breech presentation was noted in 50% of cases, though this did not show a significant statistical difference regarding the mode of delivery (p > 0.05). The research highlights a significant association between maternal age, maternal height, and fetal distress with cesarean deliveries in Subrata Hospital. Monitoring these factors may help optimize delivery outcomes. The study recommends improving maternal health strategies focusing on age and height and ensuring adequate preparation for cases involving fetal distress or breech presentations.
References
World Health Organization. World Health Organization guidelines on cesarean section. World Health Organization Report. 2004.
Smith G. Cesarean section rate appears to rise with maternal age. Cambridge University Press, UK; 2008.
Scott RT, Hankins GD. Maternal height as a risk factor for cesarean section. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;225:659-664.
Nalliah S. Report summarizing breech presentation study. Breech Presentation, USA; 2001.
Timothy P, Dennis J. Cesarean section for fetal distress. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;11:241-244.
Belizan JM, Althabe F, Barros FC, Alexander S. Rates and implications of cesarean section in Latin America: Ecological study. BMJ. 1999;319:1397-1399.
Hannah W, Chance GW. Final statement of the panel of the National Consensus Conference on Aspects of Cesarean Birth. Can Med Assoc J. 2002;122:41-52.
Goer H. Rising trend of cesarean section. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2001;12(3):20-27
Masterson S. Cesarean section facts and fiction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;200:213-220.
Gabbe S, Niebyl J, Simpson JL. Normal and problem pregnancies. 5th ed. New York: [Publisher]; 2007. Chapter 19.
Anderson A, Thomas E. Assisted vaginal delivery versus cesarean section. Life Sci Wkly. 1999;84(6):588-592.
Sanghiv R, William J, Richard R. Vaginal delivery versus cesarean section in breech presentation. J Fam Pract. 2000;19(4):1385-1390.
Smith G. Cesarean section rate appears to rise with maternal age. Cambridge University Press, UK; 2008.
Wesley F, Elfving B. Definition of fetal distress. Wiley Intersci J. 2000;81:200-205.
Bontrager K. Fetal distress. Labor & Fetal Distress. [Publisher]; 2003. Chapter.
Williams J, Colman S. Women’s guide to better birth. London: [Publisher]; 2000. Chapters 1, 2, 7.
Merchant KM, Zanini A. Normal delivery versus cesarean section. Can Med Assoc J. 2001;140:12-15.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Mawia. M.Beshti , Asarya A. Abo elghaith (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.