Estimation of maternal and fetal morbidity in high order cesarean section in Zawia

Authors

  • Karima T. Hawisa Maternity Ward, Zawia Teaching Hospital, Zawia, Libya Author
  • Somaia Algerbi Maternity Ward, Zawia Teaching Hospital, Zawia, Libya Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54361/ljmr.v8i1.01

Abstract

 To assess the maternal and neonatal risk associated with high order cesarean sections, a prospective study was carried out in Zawia hospital, maternity wards. The patient was interviewed in the labor word and performed case sheet filled with specific data. The outcome of 458 cases, 218 women undergoing cesarean section for the third time or more was compared with 240 women sectioned for the second time (P1c/s), the outcome measures were antenatal complication, maternal operative and postoperative morbidity and neonatal prematurity, Apgar scores and the need for intensive care. The antenatal complication is more in group of ≥ P2c/s, placenta previa 9 (3.7%) versus 3 (1.3%) and abruption 8 (3.3%) versus 1 (0.4%). Intraoperative complications found in 17.7% of the cases, 14.2% of the patients with P1c/s comparing with 20.8% among the cases with ≥ 2 Pc. Intra-peritoneal adhesions were more in women with ≥ P2c/s (10.8%) when compared with the women with the history of P1c/s (8.7%). The need for blood transfusion was 5.0% of women with history of ≥ P2c/s  compared with 4.1% for women with history of one previous section. The mean duration of operation for patients with P1c/s = 41.5 min and with P2 or more c/s = 47.8 min. Neonatal morbidity rate was 20.9%. There were an increased number of preterm babies in study group of ≥ 2 Pc/s.  It is concluded that high order repeat cesarean section carry risk of intraoperative and post operative complication in particularly, placenta previa and acreta and risk of blood transfusion and also neonatal morbidity is increased.                                                          

   

References

Pinette MG, et al. Vaginal birth after cesarean rates are declining rapidly in the rural state of maine. J Maternal-Fetal Neonatal Med. 2004, 16: 37-43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/147670504123312831111

Ventura SJ, et al. Final data for 1998. National vital statistics reports, 2000, 48: 1-100.

Martin JA, et al.: Births: final data for 2002. National vital statistics reports. 2003, 52: 1-113.

Hacker N and Moor JG: Essentials of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 3rd ed. Philadelphia, WB Saunders, 1998.

Takayma T, et al. Risks associated with cesarean section in women with placent previa. J Obst Gynecol Res. 1997, 23: 375-379. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1447-0756.1997.tb00861.x

Zaki ZM, et al. Risks factors and morbidity in patients with placenta previa accrete compared to placenta previa non accreta. Acta Obst Gynecol Scand. 1998, 77: 391-394. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/j.1600-0412.1998.00015.x

Kuhn EM, et al. The relationship of hospital ownership and teaching status to 30- and 180 day adjusted mortality rates. Medical Care. 1994, 32: 1098-108. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00005650-199411000-00003

Hershkowitz R, et al. One or multiple previous cesarean section are associated with similar frequency of placenta previa. Eur J Obst Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1995, 62: 185-188. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-2115(95)02194-C

Juntuenen K, Makarainen L and Kirkinen P. Outcome after a high number (4-10) of repeat cesarean sections. BJOG. 2004, 111: 561-563. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00154.x

Andolf E. and Mandolf T. Cesarean delivery and risk for postoperative adhesions and intestinal obstruction: a nested case-control study of the Swedish Medical Birth Registry. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010, 203; 4: 406.e1-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2010.07.013

Downloads

Published

30-06-2014

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

1.
Hawisa KT, Algerbi S. Estimation of maternal and fetal morbidity in high order cesarean section in Zawia . LJMR [Internet]. 2014 Jun. 30 [cited 2024 Nov. 21];8(1):1-7. Available from: https://ljmr.ly/index.php/ljmr/article/view/182