Critical analysis of risk factors and outcome of placenta previa
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54361/ljmr.v8i1.13Keywords:
Placenta previa, risk factors, pregnancy outcome, Libya.Abstract
Placenta previa is the pathology of placenta in which the placenta lies completely or partially within the lower uterine segment. According to its relationship with internal os it is divided into four grades 1, 2, 3, 4. The objective of this study was to explore the risk factors and pregnancy outcome of patient with placenta. A case control study was done on 382 subjects in which 82 were included in the cases, and 300 were included in controls who presented at Obstetrics and Gynecology Department of Tripoli medical center during 2011. Diagnosed patients of placenta previa were included in case group and other healthy subjects were included in the control group and statistical significance was also calculated. In conclusion, previous history of cesarean section, previous history of D + C, previous history of placenta previa is independent risk factors for placenta previa. An increase in the incidence of these risk factors probably contributes to a rise in the number of pregnancies complicated with placenta previa and its association with adverse maternal and prenatal outcome. Carful surveillance of these risk factors is recommended with timely delivery in order to reduce the associated complication.
Downloads
References
Oyelese Y and Smulian JC. Placenta previa, placenta accreta, and vasa previa. Obtset Gynecol. 2006, 107: 927-941.
Sheiner E, Shohamvardi I, Hallak M and Mazor M. Placenta previa: obstetric risk factors and pregnancyoutcome. J Matern Fetal Med. 2001, 10: 414-419.
Ananth CV, Smulian JC and Vnitzie LA. The association of placenta previa with history of cesarean delivery and abortion: meta analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997, 177: 1071-1078.
Faiz AS and Ananth C. Etiology and risk factors for placenta previa: an overview and meta analysis of observational studies. J Matern Fetal Med. 2003, 13: 175-190.
Koifman A, Levy A, Woulan Y and Wiznitzer A, et al. The clinical significance of bleeding during the second trimester of pregnancy. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2008, 278: 47-51.
Sheiner E, Levy A and Kat ZM. Identifying the risk factors for peri partum cesarean hysterectomy, population based study. J Reprod Med. 2003, 48: 622-626.
Manacker F, Declercq E and Macdorman MF. Cesarean delivery: background, trends, and epidemiology. Seminperinatol. 2006, 30: 235-241.
Montan S. Increased risk in the elderly parturient. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2007, 19: 110- 112.
Love CD and Wallace EM. Pregnancies complicated by placenta previa: what is appropriate management? Br J Obstet Gynecol. 1996, 103: 864-867.
Claeary-Goldman J, Malone FD and Vidaver J. Impact of maternalage on obstetric outcome. Obstet Gynecol. 2005, 105: 983-990.
Gilliam M, Rosenberq D and Davis F. The likelihood of placenta previa with greater number of cesarean deliveries and higher parity. Obstet Gynecol. 2002, 99: 976-980.
Babinszki A, Kerenyi T, Torok O, et al. Perinatal outcome in grand and great grand multi parity: effect of parity on obstetric risk factors. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999, 181: 669-674.
Abu-Heija AT, El-Jallad F and Ziadeh S. Placenta previa: effect of age, gravidty, parity and previous cesarean section. Obstet Gynecol Invest. 1999, 47: 6-8.
Shevell T, Malone FD, Vidaver J, Porter TF, et al. Associated reproductive technology and pregnancy outcome. Obstet Gynecol. 2005, 106: 1039-1045.
Kallen B, Finnstrom O, Nygren KG, et al. Invitro fertilization in Sweden: obstetric characteristics maternal morbidity and mortality. B J O G. 2005, 112: 1529-1535.
Parazzini F, Dindelli M, Luchini L and La Rosa M. Risk factor for placenta previa. 1994, 15: 321-326.
Hendricks MS, Chow Y and Singh K. Previous cesarean section and miscarriage as risk factor for developing placenta previa. J Obstet Gynecol Res. 1999, 25: 137-142.
Dashe JS, McLntire DD, Ramus RM and Twickler DM. Presistance of placenta previa according to gestational age at ultra sound detection. Obstet Gynecol. 2002, 99; 5Pt: 692-697.
Adesiyun AG, Ojabo A and Mohammed A. Fertility and obstetric outcome after cesarean myomectomy. J Obstet Gynecol. 2008, 28: 710-712.
Vergani P. Chidini A, Strobelt N, et al. Do uterine leiomyomas influence pregnancy outcome? Am J Perinatol. 1994, 11: 366-368.
Gorodeski IG and Bahari CM. The effect of placenta previa localization upon maternal and fetal neonatal outcome. J Perinat Med. 1987, 15: 169-177.
Grobman WA, Gersnoviez R, London MB, Spong CY, et al. Pregnancy outcomes for women with placenta previa in relation to the number of prior cesarean section deliveries. Obstet Gynecol. 2007, 110: 1249-1255.
Demissie K, Breckenridge MB, Joseph L and Rhoads GG. Placenta previa: preponderance of Male sex at birth. AMJ Pidemiol. 1999, 149: 824-830.
Crane JM, Vadan Holf MC, Dodds L, et al. Maternal complication, neonatal outcome with placenta previa. Am J Perinatol. 2000, 17: 101-105.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2014 Turaia A. Almaksoud (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Open Access Policy
Libyan journal of medical Research (LJMR).is an open journal, therefore there are no fees required for downloading any publication from the journal website by authors, readers, and institution.
The journal applies the license of CC BY (a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license). This license allows authors to keep ownership f the copyright of their papers. But this license permits any user to download , print out, extract, reuse, archive, and distribute the article, so long as appropriate credit is given to the authors and the source of the work.
The license ensures that the article will be available as widely as possible and that the article can be included in any scientific archive.
Editorial Policy
The publication of an article in a peer reviewed journal is an essential model for Libyan journal of medical Research (LJMR). It is necessary to agree upon standards of expected ethical behavior for all parties involved in the act of publishing: the author, the journal editorial, the peer reviewer and the publisher.
Any manuscript or substantial parts of it, submitted to the journal must not be under consideration by any other journal. In general, the manuscript should not have already been published in any journal or other citable form, although it may have been deposited on a preprint server. Authors are required to ensure that no material submitted as part of a manuscript infringes existing copyrights, or the rights of a third party.
Authorship Policy
The manuscript authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution and intellectual input to the research submitted to the journal, including design, performance, interpretation of the reported study, and writing the manuscript. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors.
Others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the manuscript but without intellectual input should only be recognized in the acknowledgements section of the manuscript. Also, one of the authors should be selected as the corresponding author to communicate with the journal and approve the final version of the manuscript for publication in the LJMR.
Peer-review Policy
- All the manuscripts submitted to LJMR will be subjected to the double-blinded peer-review process;
- The manuscript will be reviewed by two suitable experts in the respective subject area.
- Reports of all the reviewers will be considered while deciding on acceptance/revision or rejection of a manuscript.
- Editor-In-Chief will make the final decision, based on the reviewer’s comments.
- Editor-In-Chief can ask one or more advisory board members for their suggestions upon a manuscript, before making the final decision.
- Associate editor and review editors provide administrative support to maintain the integrity of the peer-review process.
- In case, authors challenge the editor’s negative decision with suitable arguments, the manuscript can be sent to one more reviewer and the final decision will be made based upon his recommendations.
