Comparative study between intermittent auscultation and cardiotocogram   in low risk group during labour in Libya

Karima T. Hawisa; Nehad    Gabassa

doi:10.54361/ljmr.v8i1.02

Authors

Karima T. Hawisa Maternity Ward, Zawia Teaching Hospital, Zawia, Libya Author
Nehad Gabassa Maternity Ward, Zawia Teaching Hospital, Zawia, Libya Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54361/ljmr.v8i1.02

Abstract

The goal of fetal heart rate monitoring has been early identification of the fetus at risk for hypoxic insult. The aim of this study is to establish the relation between FHR monitoring (CTG, intermittent auscultation) and fetal outcome and mode of delivery. It is prospective observational comparative study carried out in Zawia hospital maternity word. Study population consists of 200 women in labor having the criteria of low risk group included singleton pregnancies between 37 - 40 weeks gestation, half of them monitored by intermittent auscultation and the other half by CTG. In this study, 200 women, 100 of them fetal monitoring was done by continuous electronic monitoring by CTG, the other monitored by intermittent auscultation by pinard stethoscope. Caesarean sections were performed for 31% and 6% of both groups (electronic monitoring and pinard stethoscope) respectively, statistically significant. There are three cases delivered by instrumental delivery (ventose) one in CTG and two in fetoscpo group. Abnormality in fetal heart rate was detected in (12%) of electronic monitoring group (3.5%) of the pinard stethoscope group. The apgar score of babies in both group nearly the same (p = 0.411). The babies whose transferred in intensive care unit is higher in CTG group (26 - 20%, 9 - 6%, p = 0.374). One in CTG group has neonatal seizure. It is concluded that abnormalities in fetal heart rate were more reliably detected by electronic monitoring than with pinard stethoscope. Uses of continuous electronic monitoring carry high rate of cesarean section with no significant difference in neonatal outcome.

References

Steer PJ, Eigbe MB, Lissauer MB and Beard RW. Interrelationships among abnormal cardiotocogr-ams in labour, meconium staining of the amniotic fluid, arterial cord blood pH, and Apgar scores. Obstet Gynecol. 1989, 74: 715-721.

Killan and Goodlin R. History of fetal monitoring. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1979, 133: 325. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9378(79)90688-4

Grant A. Monitoring the fetus during labour. In: Chalmers I, Enkin M, Kierse Marc JNC, eds. Effective care in pregnancy and childbirth. vol 2. Oxford University Press, 1989, 846-882.

MacDonald D, Grant A, Sheridan-Perreira M, Boylan P and Chalmers I. The Dublin randomised trial of intrapartum fetal heart monitoring. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1985, 152: 524- 539.

Arulkumaran S and Ingemarsson I. Appropriate technology in intrapartum fetal surveillance. In: Studd J, ed. Progress in obstetrics and gynaecology. vol 8: Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 1990, 127-140.

Philpott RH and Castle WM. Cervicographs in the management of labour on primigravidae. I: The alert line for detecting abnormal labour. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commnw. 1972, 79: 592-598. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.1972.tb14207.x

Philpott RH and Castle WM. Cervicographs in the management of labour in primigravidae. II: The action line and treatment of abnormal labour. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commnw. 1972, 79: 599-602. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.1972.tb14208.x

Hon EH. The electronic evaluation of the fetal heart rate. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1958, 75: 1215. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9378(58)90707-5

Grant A. Monitoring the fetus during labour. In: Chalmers I, Enkin M, Kierse Marc JNC, eds. Effective care in pregnancy and childbirth. Vol 2: Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989, 846-882.

Haverkamp AD, Thompson HE, McFee JG and Cetrulo C. The evaluation of continuous fetal heart rate monitoring in high risk pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1986; 125: 310-320. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9378(76)90565-2

Renou P, Chang J, Anderson I, Wood C. Controlled trial of fetal intensive care. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1976, 126: 470-476. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9378(76)90641-4

Haverkamp AD, Orleans M, Langendoerfer S, McFee J, Murphy J and Thompson HE. A controlled trial of the differential effect of Intrapartum fetal monitoring. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1979, 134: 399-408. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9378(16)33082-4

Graham EM, Petersen SM and Christo DK. Intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring and the prevention of perinatal brain injury. Obstet Gynecol. 2006, 108: 656-666. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.AOG.0000230533.62760.ef

Sholapurkar SL. Intermittent auscultation of fetal heart rate during labour - a widely accepted technique for low risk pregnancies: but are the current national guidelines robust and practical? J Obstet Gynaecol. 2010, 30; 6: 537-540. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/01443615.2010.484108

Liston R, Crane J and Hamilton E. Fetal health surveillance in labour. J Obstet Gyaecol Can. 2002, 24; 3: 250 - 276; quiz 277-280. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1701-2163(16)30229-8

Thacker SB, Stroup SB and Chang M. Continuous electronic heart rate monitoring for fetal assessment during labor Cohrane Database Syst Rev. 2000, 2: CD000063. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD000063

MacDonald D, Grant A, Sheridan-Perreira M, Boylan P and Chalmers I. The Dublin randomised trial of intrapartum fetal heart monitoring. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1985, 152: 524- 539. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9378(85)90619-2

Sarnat HB and Sarnat MS. Potential new therapies for perinatal cerebral hypoxic ischaemia. In: Sankaran S, ed. Clinics in Perinatology. Philadelphia W B Saunders, 1993, 411. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0095-5108(18)30401-9