Evaluation of Brest cancer by two different modalities Ultrasound and Mammography

Authors

  • Asma Moktar Koshada Faculty of Medicine, Alzaweya University Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54361/LJM17-2.14

Keywords:

Ultrasound, Mammography, Histopathology, Oncology

Abstract

Ultrasound is an inexpensive, simple test that doesn't cause any discomfort or anxiety from claustrophobia as an Mammography  might. Ultrasound tests also don't emit any radiation, so they are safe for just about everyone. They also offer very clear images, better than those produced by an X-ray. Ultrasound can provide a more precise diagnosis than a mammogram alone and can better detect very small abnormalities and those in dense breasts. The main objective is the Confirmation of breast cancer by ultrasound, determined false negative by comparison with histopathology report and determined false positive by comparison with histopathology report.A hundred cases were present at oncology institute, they were divided in to tow group 50 were above 35y old and the other one younger than that, first group were examined by  ultrasound and mammography, while the second group were examined by ultrasound only.The study showed that about 72% of cases were having malignancy by histopathology, while the other had malignancy by either ultrasound or mammography.28 % were found to be  benign case.In conclusion , the accuracy of breast cancer  detection by ultrasound helps in decreasing waiting time for histopathological report. Therefore, ultrasound is found to be useful tool to evaluate high risk patient’s especially in young ages.

 

References

References:

W, Basset MC, Mahoney S, et al. ultrasound Imaging. 1st. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders; 2006.

The Breast. In: Rumack CM.1998 Diagnostic Ultrasound.

Stavros AT. The Breast. In: Rumack CM. Diagnostic Ultrasound. 4. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Mosby; 2011:773-839/20.

Sickles EA: Wild, J.J. and D. Neal. Use of high-frequency ultrasonic waves for detecting changes of texture in living tissues. lancet.2oo8;1:655-7

Dempsey, P. J. The history of breast ultrasound. J Ultrasound Med. July 2001;23:887-94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7863/jum.2004.23.7.887

- Smith RA, Saslow D, Sawyer KA, et al. American Cancer Society guidelines for breast cancer screening: Update 2003. CA Cancer J Clin. 2003;53:141-169. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3322/canjclin.53.3.141

- Wolfe JN: A study of breast parenchyma by mammography in the normal woman and those with benign and malignant disease. Radiology 1967; 89:201-205. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1148/89.2.201

- Ellis IO, Galea M, Broughton N, et al: Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. II. Histological type. Relationship with survival in a large study with long-term follow-up. Histopathology 1992; 20:479-489. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2559.1992.tb01032.x

- Lampejo OT, Barnes DM, Smith P, et al: Evaluation of infiltrating ductal carcinomas with a DCIS component: correlation of the histologic type of the in-situ component with the grade of the infiltrating component. Semin Diagn Pathol 1994; 11:215-222.

Downloads

Published

31-12-2023

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

1.
Moktar Koshada A. Evaluation of Brest cancer by two different modalities Ultrasound and Mammography. LJMR [Internet]. 2023 Dec. 31 [cited 2024 Nov. 21];17(2):145-53. Available from: https://ljmr.ly/index.php/ljmr/article/view/91