Pyuria as a Clinically Relevant Urinary Marker Associated with Clinical Suspicion of Neonatal Urinary Tract Infection in Suprapubic Aspiration Samples: A Retrospective Study from Tobruk, Libya

Authors

  • Amany Ibrahim Hassan͙͙ Pediatric Department, Tobruk Medical Center Author
  • Asma Abdulaziz Ibrahim Pediatric Department, Tobruk Medical Center Author
  • Nour Mosa Allafi Medical College, University of Tobruk Author
  • Marwa Mousa Mohammed Medical College, University of Tobruk Author
  • Raghda Abdalnaser Younis Medical College, University of Tobruk Author
  • Souad Faraj Sherfad Medical College, University of Tobruk Author
  • Fatima Saleh Mohammed Medical College, University of Tobruk Author
  • Ehdaa Mohammed Hamed Medical College, University of Tobruk Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54361/LJMR.20.3.106

Keywords:

Pyuria, Neonatal urinary tract infection, Suprapubic aspiration, Urinary markers, Bacteriuria, Neonatal sepsis, Diagnostic accuracy, SPA UTI-compatible, White blood cells

Abstract

Background: Urinary tract infection (UTI) is a major cause of neonatal morbidity, yet diagnosis is difficult because clinical manifestations are nonspecific. Pyuria is a long-valued indicator of UTI, but its utility in neonates, particularly with uncontaminated suprapubic aspiration (SPA) specimens, needs further investigation. Objective: To evaluate the clinical significance and utility of pyuria as the primary urinary marker for suspected neonatal UTI using SPA specimens. Methods: This retrospective observational study at Tobruk Medical Center, Libya, included 119 neonates (≤28 days) who underwent SPA urine collection between January 2024 and December 2025. Pyuria was defined as >5 white blood cells per high-power field (WBC/HPF). Associations between pyuria, bacteriuria, SPA UTI-compatible composite findings, and clinician-recorded UTI suspicion were assessed using Pearson Chi-square and Fisher’s exact tests, Results: Pyuria was present in 46 of 119 neonates (38.7%; 95% CI: 30.4%–47.6%), the most frequent urinary abnormality, compared with bacteriuria (33.8%) and SPA UTI-compatible findings (20.3%). Mild pyuria predominated (22.7%), followed by moderate (9.2%) and marked (6.7%). Pyuria was strongly associated with clinician-recorded UTI suspicion: all neonates with documented UTI (5/5) had pyuria, versus 29 of 85 (34.1%) without (Fisher’s exact test, P = 0.006). Neither bacteriuria (P = 1.000) nor the composite (P = 0.518) was significantly associated. Pyuria was not associated with antibiotic regimen (P = 0.812), Conclusion: Pyuria is the most clinically relevant urinary marker for suspected neonatal UTI in SPA specimens, supporting routine diagnostic use; however, urine culture and comprehensive clinical evaluation remain essential. Prospective studies should validate optimal pyuria thresholds.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. O'Donovan DJ, Mattoo TK. Urinary tract infections in neonates. UpToDate. Updated 2024.

2. Diviney J, Jaswon MS. Urine collection methods and dipstick testing in non-toilet-trained children. Pediatr Nephrol. 2021;36(7):1697-1708.

3. Becknell B, Watson JR. Reexamining the role of pyuria in UTI diagnosis. Pediatrics. 2024;154(6):e2024068242.

4. Shaikh N, Shope TR, Hoberman A, Vigliotti A, Kurs-Lasky M, Martin JM. Association between uropathogen and pyuria. Pediatrics. 2016;138(1):e20160087.

5. Sameer SK, Taha MJ, Alrubasy W, et al. A systematic review of the accuracy and reliability of pyuria in diagnosing pediatric urinary tract infections. Cureus. 2025;17:e79135.

6. Shaikh N, Campbell EA, Curry C, Mickles C, Cole EB, Liu H, et al. Accuracy of screening tests for the diagnosis of urinary tract infections in young children. Pediatrics. 2024;154(6):e2024066600.

7. Hsu LS, Chen I, Yao CS, Huang YS, Chang JT, Wang HP, Fang NW. Uropathogens and clinical manifestations of pyuria-negative urinary tract infections in young infants: a single-center cross-sectional study. J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2024;57(4):609-616.

8. Gomez B, Mier A, Ugedo A, Aguirre-Quiñonero A, Benito J, Mintegi S. Role of urine Gram stain in young febrile infants with a suspected urinary tract infection: a cohort study. Arch Dis Child. 2024;109(10):801-805.

9. Williams GJ, Macaskill P, Chan SF, Craig JC. Absolute and relative accuracy of rapid urine tests for urinary tract infection in children: a meta-analysis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2010;10(4):240-250.

10. Mohamed W, Algameel A, Bassyouni R, Mahmoud AT. Prevalence and predictors of urinary tract infection in full-term and preterm neonates. Egypt Pediatr Assoc Gaz. 2020;68:12.

11. Albarrak M, Alzomor O, Almaghrabi R, et al. Diagnosis and management of community-acquired urinary tract infection in infants and children: clinical guidelines endorsed by the Saudi Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society (SPIDS). Int J Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2021;8:57-70.

12. Ergül Sarı E, Salihoglu O. Renal ultrasonography findings are associated with urinary tract infection in neonates with asymptomatic hyperbilirubinemia. J Perinatol. 2026.

13. Subcommittee on Urinary Tract Infection. Reaffirmation of AAP clinical practice guideline: the diagnosis and management of the initial urinary tract infection in febrile infants and young children 2-24 months of age. Pediatrics. 2016;138(6):e20163026.

Downloads

Published

12-11-2026

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

1.
Hassan͙͙ A, Ibrahim A, Allafi N, Mohammed M, Younis R, Sherfad S, et al. Pyuria as a Clinically Relevant Urinary Marker Associated with Clinical Suspicion of Neonatal Urinary Tract Infection in Suprapubic Aspiration Samples: A Retrospective Study from Tobruk, Libya. LJMR [Internet]. 2026 Nov. 12 [cited 2026 Nov. 14];20(3):762-8. Available from: https://ljmr.ly/index.php/ljmr/article/view/669

Similar Articles

1-10 of 162

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.