Effects of Virgin Olive Oil on Renal Function and Histopathological Alterations in Hyperlipidemic Rats
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54361/LJMR.20.2.61Keywords:
Virgin olive oil, hyperlipidemia, Kidney injury, histopathology, ratsAbstract
Background: hyperlipidemias represent one of the possible factors which contribute to the aetiology, pathogenesis and establishment of renal diseases. In our present work, we are targeting to study the effect of the administration of Virgin Olive Oil at low and high doses on kidney function and histopathology in hyperlipidaemic male albino rats. Material & Methods: Male albino rats were grouped into a normal and hyperlipidemic diet, and some hyperlipidemic groups were treated with the addition of virgin olive oil at (LOW and HIGH doses). Serum kidney parameters were measured to evaluate kidney functionality. Kidneys were then excised, processed and examined for histology by staining with Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E). Results: In hyperlipidemic treated animals (LOW and HIGH doses), the levels of urea concentration were significantly reduced in the two groups as compared to the other two groups (hyperlipidemic without treatment and normolipidemic). No significant differences were observed for serum creatinine levels between any of the experimental groups. Light microscopic examination of the kidneys revealed evident restoration of the kidney tissue lesions that were present in the hyperlipidemic without treatment groups, and a greater recovery effect was reported in the high dose of olive oil, with kidney tissues close to the normalised kidney tissues. Conclusion: virgin olive oil, at both doses (LOW and HIGH), protects against kidney injury resulting from hyperlipidemias in male albino rats. It improves renal tissue histopathology and lowers serum urea concentration in conditions of hyperlipidemias.
Downloads
References
1. Ruan XZ, et al. Hyperlipidemia-induced renal injury: pathogenesis and therapeutic possibilities. Kidney Res Clin Pract. 2019;38(4):449-460.
2. Zhang Y, Vaziri ND. Mechanisms of lipid-induced kidney injury. J Ren Nutr. 2017;27(1):13-22.
3. Muntner P, Sharma P, Fox CS, et al. Lipid levels and risk of chronic kidney disease. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2018;13(10):1474-1483.
4. Navaneethan SD, Zelnick LR, Yehnert H, et al. Dyslipidemia and CKD progression: findings from a longitudinal cohort. Am J Kidney Dis. 2019;74(4):511-519.
5. Wyatt C, et al. Lipid abnormalities and CKD progression: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2021;36(5):761-770.
6. Vaziri ND. Dyslipidemia of chronic kidney disease: the nature, mechanisms, and potential consequences. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2016;310(6):F515-F527.
7. Hsu CC, Lee TC, Chien KL, et al. Association of hyperlipidemia with kidney disease progression among patients with diabetic nephropathy. Kidney Int. 2018;94(3):541-550.
8. Campbell RT, Smith KA, Jones PW. Lipid-lowering therapy and renal outcomes: current evidence and future directions. J Nephrol Hypertens. 2022;33(1):45-53.
9. Tonelli M, Moye LA, Pfeffer MA, et al. Effects of statins on kidney disease progression and cardiovascular outcomes: a meta-analysis. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2019;7(9):739-748.
10. National Research Council. Nutrient requirements of laboratory rats. 2nd ed. Washington (DC): National Academy Press; 1977.
11. AOAC International. Official methods of analysis of AOAC International. 19th ed. Gaithersburg (MD): AOAC International; 2012.
12. Bartolini G, Prevost G, Messeri C, Carignani G, editors. Olive germplasm: cultivars and worldwide collections. Rome: FAO; 1998.
13. Fawcett JK, Scott JE. A rapid and precise method for the determination of urea. J Clin Pathol. 1960;13:156-159.
14. Houot O. Interpretation of clinical laboratory tests. In: Henny J, Siest G, Schiele F, Young DS, editors. Interpretation of clinical laboratory tests. 1985.
15. Bancroft JD, Stevens A. Theory and practice of histological techniques. 3rd ed. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 1997.
16. Snedecor GW, Cochran WG. Statistical methods. 7th ed. Ames (IA): Iowa State University Press, 1980.
17. Carvounis CP, Nisar S, Guro-Razuman S. Significance of the fractional excretion of urea in the differential diagnosis of acute renal failure. Kidney Int. 2002;62(6):2223-2229.
18. Bishop ML, Fody EP, Schoeff LE. Clinical chemistry: principles, procedures, correlations. 5th ed. Philadelphia (PA): Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2005.
19. Sheyla LM, de Paula H, Pedrosa ML, dos Santos RC, de Oliveira EL, Chianca Júnior DA, et al. Dietary models for inducing hypercholesterolemia in rats. Braz Arch Biol Technol. 2005;48(2):203-209.
20. Montilla P, Espejo I, Muñoz MC, Bujalance I, Muñoz-Castañeda JR, Túnez I. Protective effect of red wine on oxidative stress and antioxidant enzyme activities in the brain and kidney induced by feeding high cholesterol in rats. Clin Nutr. 2006;25(1):146-153.
21. Trevisan R, Dodesini AR, Lepore G. Lipids and renal disease. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006;17:S145-S147.
22. Teixeira PT, Benjamin S, Rondina D, Marques M, Viana D, Gonzaga M, et al. Antihypercholesterolemic effects of aqueous extract of Copernicia prunifera (Miller) H.E. Moore fruits in mice with diet-induced hypercholesterolemia. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2017.
23. Farkas J, Farkas P, Hyde D. Liver and gastroenterology tests. In: Lee M, editor. Basic skills in interpreting laboratory data. 3rd ed. Bethesda (MD): American Society of Health-System Pharmacists; 2004. p.330-336.
24. Bawazir AE. Chronic effect of olive oil on some neurotransmitter contents in different brain regions and the physiological and histological structure of the liver and kidney of male albino rats. World J Neurosci. 2011;1:31-37.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Mohamed Ali Aborokia , Ali A. Aghwider (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Open Access Policy
Libyan journal of medical Research (LJMR).is an open journal, therefore there are no fees required for downloading any publication from the journal website by authors, readers, and institution.
The journal applies the license of CC BY (a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license). This license allows authors to keep ownership f the copyright of their papers. But this license permits any user to download , print out, extract, reuse, archive, and distribute the article, so long as appropriate credit is given to the authors and the source of the work.
The license ensures that the article will be available as widely as possible and that the article can be included in any scientific archive.
Editorial Policy
The publication of an article in a peer reviewed journal is an essential model for Libyan journal of medical Research (LJMR). It is necessary to agree upon standards of expected ethical behavior for all parties involved in the act of publishing: the author, the journal editorial, the peer reviewer and the publisher.
Any manuscript or substantial parts of it, submitted to the journal must not be under consideration by any other journal. In general, the manuscript should not have already been published in any journal or other citable form, although it may have been deposited on a preprint server. Authors are required to ensure that no material submitted as part of a manuscript infringes existing copyrights, or the rights of a third party.
Authorship Policy
The manuscript authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution and intellectual input to the research submitted to the journal, including design, performance, interpretation of the reported study, and writing the manuscript. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors.
Others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the manuscript but without intellectual input should only be recognized in the acknowledgements section of the manuscript. Also, one of the authors should be selected as the corresponding author to communicate with the journal and approve the final version of the manuscript for publication in the LJMR.
Peer-review Policy
- All the manuscripts submitted to LJMR will be subjected to the double-blinded peer-review process;
- The manuscript will be reviewed by two suitable experts in the respective subject area.
- Reports of all the reviewers will be considered while deciding on acceptance/revision or rejection of a manuscript.
- Editor-In-Chief will make the final decision, based on the reviewer’s comments.
- Editor-In-Chief can ask one or more advisory board members for their suggestions upon a manuscript, before making the final decision.
- Associate editor and review editors provide administrative support to maintain the integrity of the peer-review process.
- In case, authors challenge the editor’s negative decision with suitable arguments, the manuscript can be sent to one more reviewer and the final decision will be made based upon his recommendations.












https://portal.issn.org/resource/ISSN/2413-6069