Occupational Radiation Exposure and Health Effects Among Medical Imaging Staff in Benghazi, Libya: A Cross-Sectional Study, 2026
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54361/LJMR.20.2.38Keywords:
Occupational radiation exposure, radiation protection, medical imaging staff, osimetry, radiation safety training, Benghazi, LibyaAbstract
Background: Medical imaging staff are at risk of occupational radiation exposure, which can lead to serious health effects if proper protective measures are not implemented. This study evaluates radiation protection practices, availability of protective equipment, training, and self-reported health effects among medical imaging personnel in Benghazi, Libya. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 200 medical imaging staff (radiologists, radiologic technologists, and nurses) working in public and private hospitals, diagnostic centers, and clinics in Benghazi, Libya, from January to February 2026. Data were collected using an online structured questionnaire (Google Forms) containing 24 questions covering demographics, protective equipment availability and use, dosimeter availability, radiation safety training, work-related symptoms, diagnosed health conditions, challenges, and priorities for improvement. The questionnaire was shared via social media platforms commonly used by medical imaging staff. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics (frequencies and percentages).Results: Most participants were aged 25–34 years (62%), with 55% female and 45% male. The majority worked in government hospitals (70%). Basic protective equipment was unavailable for 55% of participants, and only 28% had access to lead aprons. Personal dosimeters were absent for 78% of staff. Only 17% reported receiving regular annual safety training. Despite the lack of formal training, 46% of participants rated their personal knowledge as 'good,' 39% as 'moderate,' and 15% as 'poor'; 85% rated workplace protective measures as insufficient. Common symptoms included persistent fatigue (46%), hair loss (41%), headaches (38%), and vision problems (34%). Diagnosed conditions included anemia (19%), thyroid disorders (10%), and cataracts (5%). Major barriers included lack of equipment (65%), no dosimeters (58%), high workload (50%), and lack of accountability (40%).Conclusion: There are serious deficiencies in radiation safety infrastructure, training, and health surveillance among medical imaging staff in Benghazi. These gaps are associated with a high prevalence of radiation-related symptoms and conditions. Urgent, multi-level interventions are required to protect this essential healthcare workforce.
Downloads
References
1. Ahmad D, Almatari M, Tumayhi M. Occupational Exposure of Scatter Radiation and Proper Protective Methods. J Healthc Sci. 2022;2(1):1-8.
2. Siddiquee A. The Impact of Occupational Radiation Exposure on Radiographers and the Practical Realities of Radiation Protection Practices. Int J Sci Res Eng Manage. 2025;9(1):1-9.
3. Kyei K, Addo H, Daniels J. Radiation safety: knowledge, attitudes, practices, and perceived socioeconomic impact in a limited-resource radiotherapy setting. ecancermedicalscience. 2025;19:1855.
4. Malunda R, Kiyombo G, Kieto E, Beya C. Analysis of the implementation of radiation protection measures in imaging services: A cross-sectional study of health facilities in Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo. Ann Afr Med. 2025;18(3):210-218.
5. Patel S, Jenkins P, Zhong J. Better safe than so ray: national survey of radiation protection amongst interventional radiology trainees in the United Kingdom. Br J Radiol. 2023;96(1142):20230071.
6. Xie Y, Wang X, Lan Y. Assessment of radiation knowledge among medical personnel in nuclear emergency preparedness: a cross-sectional study. Front Public Health. 2025; 13:1547818.
7. Safina F, Tabassum S, Satiwan K, Shahbaz B, Naeem M. Knowledge of Radiation Hazards and Attitude toward Radioprotection among Radiography Healthcare Professionals. Biol Clin Sci Res J. 2025;6(6):1875.
8. Radaideh K, Matalqah L, Radaideh L. Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices of Occupational Radiation Safety Among Healthcare Professionals: A Multi-Setting Study in Jordan. Health Phys. 2025;128(2):101-110.
9. Allam S, Algany M, Khider Y. Radiation safety compliance awareness among healthcare workers exposed to ionizing radiation. BMC Nurs. 2024; 23:115.
10. Haddar A, Sellami I, Ghrab M, Hajjaji M, Hammami J, Masmoudi M. Attitude and Perceptions of Healthcare workers regarding ionizing radiation. Eur Psychiatry. 2024;67(S1):S819-S820.
11. Elmorabit N, Marrakchi A, Chelh F, Zaizoune S, Azougagh M, Ennibi O. Knowledge and practices of interventional radiology staff regarding radiation protection. Multidiscip Rev. 2024;7(1):e2025062.
12. Almohammed H, Elshami W, Hamd Z, Abuzaid M. Enhancing radiation safety awareness and practices among female radiographers: a comprehensive approach. BMC Health Serv Res. 2024; 24:210.
13. Alemayehu T, Bogale G, Bazie G. Occupational radiation exposure dose and associated factors among radiology personnel in Eastern Amhara, Ethiopia. PLOS ONE. 2023;18(6):e0286400.
14. Diop O, Diawara A, Diatta A. Knowledge and practices in radiation protection of workers under ionizing radiation in hospitals in Dakar. Pakistan J Nucl Med. 2024;12(2):55-63.
15. Sahoo T, Ahmadi A, Amarkhil O. Radiation Safety Awareness and Practice among Radiology Staff in Kabul National Specialty Hospitals. Eximia. 2023; 11:145-153.
16. Ali Q. Status Study of Professional Protection from Ionizing Radiation Hazards Among Radiation Workers in Diagnostic Radiology Departments at Benghazi Hospitals, Libya. ARID Int J Sci Technol. 2019;2(3):45-52.
17. Sherfad M, Alhaddad O. Radiation Protection Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Among Fluoroscopy-Utilizing Doctors at Misurata Medical Centre, Libya. AlQalam J Med Appl Sci. 2024;7(3):331-338.
18. Bolowia N. Knowledge and Awareness about Radiation Protection and Hazards among Healthcare Workers in Tobruk Medical Centre. AlQalam J Med Appl Sci. 2025;8(1):145-152.
19. Ng S, Sa F. Assessment of Awareness and Practice of Ionizing Radiation Protection Procedures Among Exposed Health Care Workers. Egypt J Occup Med. 2020;44(3):529-544.
20. Khan H, Ahmad B, Ullah I, Gul G. Assessment of Knowledge Regarding Harmful Effects of Radiation and Protection Protocols Among Radiology Undergraduate Private Sector Students. Insights J Health Rehabil. 2025;3(2):45-52.
21. Abuzreda A, Yousif AB, Alzayani A, Abdulrahman SA, Mohammed AA, Shomata MM. Comprehensive Administrative and Engineering Strategies for Radiation Protection and Occupational Health Safety. Clinical and Medical Engineering Live. 2025 ;3(1):1-8.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Amenh B. Yousif , Hamad A. Mustafa , Fatma Younis , Basma Wanis Madi , Mohammed Mustafa Buzaridah , Abdelsalam Abuzreda (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Open Access Policy
Libyan journal of medical Research (LJMR).is an open journal, therefore there are no fees required for downloading any publication from the journal website by authors, readers, and institution.
The journal applies the license of CC BY (a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license). This license allows authors to keep ownership f the copyright of their papers. But this license permits any user to download , print out, extract, reuse, archive, and distribute the article, so long as appropriate credit is given to the authors and the source of the work.
The license ensures that the article will be available as widely as possible and that the article can be included in any scientific archive.
Editorial Policy
The publication of an article in a peer reviewed journal is an essential model for Libyan journal of medical Research (LJMR). It is necessary to agree upon standards of expected ethical behavior for all parties involved in the act of publishing: the author, the journal editorial, the peer reviewer and the publisher.
Any manuscript or substantial parts of it, submitted to the journal must not be under consideration by any other journal. In general, the manuscript should not have already been published in any journal or other citable form, although it may have been deposited on a preprint server. Authors are required to ensure that no material submitted as part of a manuscript infringes existing copyrights, or the rights of a third party.
Authorship Policy
The manuscript authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution and intellectual input to the research submitted to the journal, including design, performance, interpretation of the reported study, and writing the manuscript. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors.
Others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the manuscript but without intellectual input should only be recognized in the acknowledgements section of the manuscript. Also, one of the authors should be selected as the corresponding author to communicate with the journal and approve the final version of the manuscript for publication in the LJMR.
Peer-review Policy
- All the manuscripts submitted to LJMR will be subjected to the double-blinded peer-review process;
- The manuscript will be reviewed by two suitable experts in the respective subject area.
- Reports of all the reviewers will be considered while deciding on acceptance/revision or rejection of a manuscript.
- Editor-In-Chief will make the final decision, based on the reviewer’s comments.
- Editor-In-Chief can ask one or more advisory board members for their suggestions upon a manuscript, before making the final decision.
- Associate editor and review editors provide administrative support to maintain the integrity of the peer-review process.
- In case, authors challenge the editor’s negative decision with suitable arguments, the manuscript can be sent to one more reviewer and the final decision will be made based upon his recommendations.
https://portal.issn.org/resource/ISSN/2413-6069
