Umbilical Oxytocin in the 3rd stage of labour (A substitute to minimize the risk of PPH)

Authors

  • Mohamed Sultan Depaatement of Obsetric & Gnecology, Faculty of Medicine, Tripoli University Author
  • Ghada ElMahmudi Aljalaa Maternit Hospital, Tripoli – Libya Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54361/

Keywords:

Postpartum hemorrhage, Oxytocin, Umbilical vein, 3rd stage of labour

Abstract

 Objective: The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of intra umbilical injection of oxytocin on shortening of the 3rd stage duration, minimizing the blood loss during the 3rd and 4th stages of labour, minimizing the risk of post- partum hemorrhage and retained placenta, found an alternative method for active management of 3rd stage where ergometrine is contraindicated e.g. hypertension, cardiac disease. Material & Methods: across sectional prospective study on 100 pregnant ladies in the period between July and August 2012 whose presented for vaginal delivery in labour suite in Aljalaa Maternity Hospital, Tripoli – Libya, exclusion criteria are those associated with risk of hemorrhage such as multiple gestation, preeclampsia, antepartum hemorrhage, and coagulopathy, after enrollment the patient was excluded if C/S is indicated. The cases are divided into two groups (50 cases each), Group A: expectant management was applied via giving 0.4 mg Ergometrine IM after placental delivery,Group B: 20 IU Oxytocin injected into the umbilical vein within 30 seconds of the delivery of the baby and cord clamping, the amount of blood loss during the 3rd and 4th stage of labour was estimated and the time taken for placenta to be delivered was recorded for both groups,Hb concentration was measured and then compared with pre- delivery hemoglobin. Results:The incidence of PPH is high in our hospital compared with international figures, blood loss > 500 ml was more (2 fold) in group A, the duration of 3rd stage was significantly less (3fold) with group B, side effects (e.g. nausea and raised BP) were more with group A, 1, There was no significant difference in hemoglobin level reduction. 

References

World health organization (WHO), department of reproduction health & research, maternal mortality in 2000, Geneva: WHO; 2004 available at www.childinf.org/maternal mortality in 2000.pdf

Royston E, Armstrong S, Preventing maternal death, Geneva WHO,1989

Razvik, Chua S, Arulkumarans S, Ratanam SS, A comparison between visual estimation & laboratory determination of blood loss during 3rd stage of labour, Aust NZJ obstst gynecology, 1996;36:152-4

Child mortality page UNICEF monitoring the situation of children & women available at www.childinfo.org/areas/child mortality/infant data.php.assessed july.11.200

Anonymous, The management of postpartum hemorrhage, drug therapy.1992;30:89-92

Prendiville WJ, Elbourne D, Mc Donald S, Active versus expectant management in 3rd stage of labour (Cochrane review), Cochrane library, issue 4, Oxford: update software, 2001.

Bendetti TJ, Gabbes G, Neibyl JR, Simpson JL, Obstetrics; normal and problem pregnancies,3rd edition, New York: Churchill Livingstone,1996;499- 532

Bowes WA, Clinical aspects of normal and abnormal labour,2002;122-25

Long P, Bleeding and 3rd stage of labour, 1991; 2:385-95

Kimbell N, Brandt-Andrews technique of placental delivery, BMJ, 1954;1: 130-32

Prendiville WJ, Harding JE, Elbourne DR, Stirrat GM, The Bristol 3rd stage trial: active versus physiological management of 3rd stage of labour BMJ; 1988; 297: 1295-1300

Tandberg A, Alberchtsen S, Iverson OE, Manual removal of placenta, Act obstet- gynecol ; 1999; 78: 33-36b

Ladipo OA, Management of 3rd stage of labour with particular reference to reduction of feto-maternal transfusion, BMJ 1972; 1: 721-23

Katzung BG, Basic and clinical pharmacology, 1987; 195-96

Rains AJ, Mann CV, Bailey & Loves short practice of surgery, 1988: 57-58

Steven L, Emergencies in obstetrics & gynecology, 1994; 188 ;621 1994

Steegers, Eskers, Symonds, Clinical obstetrics &gynecology

Keith ED, Dewhurst’s textbook of obstetrics and gynecology for postgraduates, 1999; 333

Martinez MM, Lopez JA, Ramos G, Gineco obstet mex., 2006; 74(2) 89-94

Borgvall B, Bostromk M, Randomized control trial in decreased numbers of placenta retention offer Oxytocin compared to Ergometrine, 1990; 7; 87 (6): 37

Carroli G, Bergel E, Cochrane library, issue 3,2006,Chicester, UK, Jon Wiley sons. Ltd

Khan GQ, John IS, Chat T, Wanis AO, Abu Dhabi 3rd stage trial, Euro J obstet gynecol, 1995; 58 (2): 147-51

Kenneth WJ, John RA, Glenn KS, Molles E, Angela H, Jane T, American obst,gynaecol,2001; 185 : 875

Golan A, Lidor AL, Wexler S, David MP, New method for management of the retained placenta, AMJ obstet gynecol, 1983

Dahiya P, Puri M, Rathee S, Indian journal, med sci. 1995; 49 (2):23-7

Andrew D. Weeks, The retained placenta, Progress in obstetrics and Gynaecology No.16, Edited by John Studd, 2005; 133-51

Downloads

Published

30-06-2017

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

1.
Sultan M, El-Mahmudi G. Umbilical Oxytocin in the 3rd stage of labour (A substitute to minimize the risk of PPH) . LJMR [Internet]. 2017 Jun. 30 [cited 2024 Nov. 24];11(1):20-32. Available from: https://ljmr.ly/index.php/ljmr/article/view/242