The influence of Two Surface Treatment Techniques with Different Adhesive Systems on the Shear Bond Strength of Composite Resin Repair Shaban A. Aml

Aml Shaban

doi:10.54361/LJMR.19.1.08

Authors

Aml .A .Shaban Faculty of Dentistry University of Zawia - Libya Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54361/LJMR.19.1.08

Keywords:

composite repair, surface treatment, bonding procedures, shear bond strength

Abstract

purpose: To evaluate the influence of different adhesive application protocols with two surface treatment methods on the shear bond strength of aged composite repair.

Material and methods: 90 cylindrical shaped samples (8mm × 4mm) were prepared from Estelite Sigma Quick composite resin, After the thermocycling thesamples were divided into two main groups according to the surface treatment and then each group were further subdivided to five groups according to bonding procedures. For the repair, the same brand of old composite with same shade was used. Then the shear bond strength test was completed by the Universal Testing Machine. For statistical analysis the IBM SPSS statistics program was used (SPSS IBM, Turkey).

Results: There was statistical significant difference between the shear bond strength values in Mpa among all sub-groups.

conclusion: The shear bond strength obtained by the mechanical surface grinding with diamond bur is statistically significant higher than that obtained with air abrasion surface treatment. The combination of universal adhesive system or two-step self-etch adhesive system and grinding with diamond bur for repair procedures provide the highest values of SBS.

References

Ferracane JL. Current trends in dental composites. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 6(4):302–18, 1995.

Cenci M, Demarco F, de Carvalho R. Class II composite resin restorations with two polymerization techniques: relationship between microtensile bond strength and marginal leakage. J Dent 2005;33:603–10.

Gordan VV et al. Repair or replacement of defective restorations by dentists in The Dental PBRN J Am Dent Assoc. 2012 June; 143(6): 593–601.

Demarco FF, Collares K, Corra MB, Cenci MS, Moraes RR, Opdam NJM. Should my composite restorations last forever? Why are they failing?

Demarco FF. et al. Longevity of posterior composite restorations: Not only a matter of materials dental materials 28 (2012) 87-101.

Hasani Tabatabaei M, Alizade Y, Taalim S. Effect of various surface treatment on repair strength of composite resin.

Padipatvuthikul P, Mair LH. Bonding of composite to water aged composite with surface treatments. Dent Mater. 2007; 23: 519-25.

Söderholm KJ, Roberts MJ. Variables influencing the repair strength of dental composites. Scand J Dent Res 99:173-80, 1991.

Trajtenberg CP, Powers JM. Bond strengths of repaired laboratory composites using three surface treatments and three primers.Am J Dent 2004; 17: 123-126.

Brendeke J, Ozcan M. Effect of physicochemical aging conditions on the composite-composite repair bond strength. J Adhes Dent 9:399-406, 2007.

Albers HF. Tooth Colored Restoratives Principles and Techniques, 9th ed. Hamilton: BC Decker Inc p. 148-52, 2002.

Rodrigues, S.A., Jr.; Ferracane, J.L.; Della Bona, A. Influence of surface treatments on the bond strength of repaired resin composite restorative materials. Dent. Mater 25, 442–451, 2009.

Hemadri M, Saritha G, Rajasekhar V, Pachlag KA, Purushotham R, Reddy VKK. Shear Bond Strength of Repaired Composites Using Surface Treatments and Repair Materials: An In vitro Study, Journal of International Oral Health 6(6): 22-25, 2014.

Melo MA, Moysés MR, Santos SG, Alcântara CE, Ribeiro JC. Effects of different surface treatments and accelerated artificial aging on the bond strength of composite resin repairs. Braz Oral Res 2011; 25: 143-149.

Shahdad SA, Kennedy JG. Bond strength of repaired anterior composite resins: An in vitro study. J Dent 1998; 26(8):685-694.

Brosh, T.; Pilo, R.; Bichacho, N.; Blutstein, R. Effect of combinations of surface treatments and bonding agents on the bond strength of repaired composites.

Shahdad SA, Kennedy JG. Bond strength of repaired anterior composite resins: An in vitro study. J Dent 1998; 26(8):685-694.

Lucena-Mart′in C, Gonza′lez-L′opez S, Navajas-Rodr´I guez de Mondelo JM. The effect of various surface treatments and bonding agents on the repaired strength of heat-treated composites.

Cavalcanti AN, De Lima AF, Peris AR, Mitsui FH, Marchi GM. Effect of surface treatments and bonding agents on the bond strength of repaired composites.

Versluis A, Tantbirojn D, Douglas WH. Why do shear bond tests pull out dentin? J Dent Res 76: 1298-1307, 1997.

Söderholm KJ, Roberts MJ. Variables influencing the repair strength of dental composites. Scand J Dent Res 99:173-80, 1991.

Rathke A, Tymina Y, Haller B Effect of different surface treatments on the composite-composite repair bond strength. Clin Oral Investig 13(3):317–323, 2008.

Da Costa, T.R.; Serrano, A.M.; Atman, A.P.; Loguercio, A.D.; Reis, A. Durability of composite repair using different surface treatments. J. Dent 40, 513–521, 2012.

Rathke A, Tymina Y, Haller B Effect of different surface treatments on the composite-composite repair bond strength. Clin Oral Investig 13(3):317–323, 2008.

Brosh, T.; Pilo, R.; Bichacho, N.; Blutstein, R. Effect of combinations of surface treatments and bonding agents on the bond strength of repaired composites. J. Prosthet. Dent. 1997, 77, 122–126.

Tabatabaei MH, Alizade Y, Taalim S. Effect of various surface treatments on repair strength of composite resin. J Dent TUMS 1:5-11, 2004.

Bonstein T, Garlapo D, Donarummo J Jr, Bush PJ. Evaluation of varied repair protocols applied to aged composit resin. J Adhes Dent 2005; 7: 41-49.

Cavalcanti AN, De Lima AF, Peris AR, Mitsui FH, Marchi GM. Effect of surface treatments and bonding agents on the bond strength of repaired composites. J Esthet Restor Dent 2007; 19(2):90- 98; discussion 99.

Tabatabaei MH, Alizade Y, Taalim S. Effect of various surface treatments on repair strength of composite resin. J Dent TUMS 1:5-11, 2004.

Lucena-Mart′in C, Gonza′lez-L′opez S, Navajas-Rodr´I guez de Mondelo JM. The effect of various surface treatments and bonding agents on the repaired strength of heat-treated composites. J Prosthet Dent 86:481-488, 2001.

Kiomarsi N, Espahbodi M, chiniforush N, Karazifard MJ, Hashemi Kamangar SS in vitro evaluation of repair bond strength of composite: Effect of surface treatments with bur and laser and application of universal adhesive.

Pinar Altinci, Murat Mutluay & Arzu Tezvergil-Mutluay Repair bond strength of nanohybrid composite resins with a universal adhesive, Acta Biomaterialia Odontologica Scandinavica.

Cavalcanti AN, De Lima AF, Peris AR, Mitsui FH, Marchi GM. Effect of surface treatments and bonding agents on the bond strength of repaired composites. J Esthet Restor Dent 2007; 19(2):90- 98; discussion 99.

Fawzy AS, El-Askary FS, Amer MA (2008) Effect of surface treatments on the tensile bond strength of repaired water-aged anterior restorative micro-fine hybrid resin composite. J Dent 36 (12):969–976.

Ahmadizenouz G, Esmaeili B, Taghvaei A, Jamali Z, Jafari T, Amiri Daneshvar F, Khafri S. Effect of different surface treatments on the shear bond strength of nanofilled composite repairs. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects 2016; 10(1):9-16.

Tabatabaei MH, Alizade Y, Taalim S. Effect of various surface treatments on repair strength of composite resin. J Dent TUMS 1:5-11, 2004.

Burrow MF, Nophakeepong U, Phrukkanon S: A comparison of mi-crotensile bond strengths of several dentin bonding systems to primary and permanent dentin. Dent-Mat 18: 239-24, 2002.

Pinar Altinci, Murat Mutluay & Arzu Tezvergil-Mutluay Repair bond strength of nanohybrid composite resins with a universal adhesive, Acta Biomaterialia Odontologica Scandinavica, 4:1, 10-19, DOI: 10.1080 / 23337931.1412262, 2017.